Human Rights Watch: Charges vs De Lima ‘politically motivated’

Jodesz Gavilan

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Human Rights Watch: Charges vs De Lima ‘politically motivated’
The global group says the filing of drug charges against Senator Leila de Lima is an 'act of political vindictiveness'

MANILA, Philippines – An international human rights organization urged the Philippine government to drop “politically-motivated charges” against Senator Leila de Lima.  

Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Sunday, February 19, said the prosecution of De Lima is an “act of political vindictiveness” as she is one of the few vocal critics of President Rodrigo Duterte in the government. 

“The prosecution of Senator Leila de Lima is an act of political vindictiveness that debases the rule of law in the Philippines,” HRW deputy Asia director Phelim Kine said. “The Duterte administration seems intent on using the courts to punish prominent critics of its murderous ‘war on drugs.'”

The Department of Justice (DOJ), on Friday, February 17, filed drug charges against its former head for allegedly accepting bribes from drug convicts inside the New Bilibid Prison (NBP) in Muntinlupa City. (READ: DOJ panel files drug charges vs De Lima)

The filing of charges was the culmination of numerous public hearings where convicts and former colleagues testified in front of legislators regarding the drug trade inside the national penitentiary. 

The DOJ later dropped the drug charges against the inmates and turned them into state witnesses against the senator.  

According to HRW, the prosecution of De Lima is “a relentless government campaign of harassment and intimidation” that came with her outspoken criticism of Duterte’s intense anti-drug campaign and also allegations of vigilante-style killings in Davao City.

As chairperson of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR), De Lima led the investigation on the alleged existence of the Davao Death Squad (DDS) which has been accused of carrying out at least 1,000 summary killings. 

In 2012, the CHR said it found “probable cause” and recommended that the Office of the Ombudsman investigate the “possible administrative and criminal liability” of Duterte in relation to the numerous killings under his watch as Davao City mayor. 

Years later in 2016, the investigations on the DDS were “closed and terminated.” (READ: Davao Death Squad: What ever happened to the investigations?)

“The politically motivated case against De Lima shows how Duterte’s ‘war on drugs’ threatens not only the thousands of people targeted, but the criminal justice and political systems,” Kine said. 

“It’s more important than ever that concerned lawmakers and foreign governments step up to denounce the Duterte administration’s disregard for basic human rights,” he added. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!
Natsu Ando

author

Jodesz Gavilan

Jodesz Gavilan is a writer and researcher for Rappler and its investigative arm, Newsbreak. She covers human rights and impunity beats, producing in-depth and investigative reports particularly on the quest for justice of victims of former president Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs and war on dissent.