Legal showdown between Iggy’s wives begins

Paterno R. Esmaquel II

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Their lawyers' arguments could prove instructive for Filipinos entangled in similar cases

MANILA, Philippines – The legal showdown has begun between the 2 wives of the late Negros Occidental Rep Ignacio “Iggy” Arroyo, whose burial depends on the outcome of London court hearings on Monday, February 20.

Lawyers of both camps – of legal wife Alicia “Aleli” Arroyo and of common-law wife Grace Ibuna – have presented arguments that could also prove instructive for Filipinos entangled in similar cases.

LEGAL SHOWDOWN. Lawyers of opposing camps cite the Civil Code in defending their clients’ rights over the late Ignacio “Iggy” Arroyo’s remains. Screen grabs courtesy of TV Patrol

Aleli’s lawyer, Lorna Kapunan, has cited Article 305 of the Civil Code of the Philippines in defending her client’s right over the remains of the late representative. 

“The duty and the right to make arrangements for the funeral of a relative shall be in accordance with the order established for support, under Article 294,” the Civil Code says.

Article 294, in turn, states the following: “The claim for support, when proper and 2 or more persons are obliged to give it, shall be made in the following order: (1) from the spouse; (2) from the descendants of the nearest degree; (3) from the ascendants, also of the nearest degree; (4) from the brothers and sisters.

Aleli’s camp has asserted that her marriage to Arroyo was never annulled. Thus, Aleli remains his next of kin, Kapunan argued.

Custody

In a text message on Saturday, February 18, Kapunan said Aleli had filed for an injunction before the Quezon City Regional Trial Court to gain custody over Arroyo’s remains. Aleli completed her testimony before the Quezon City RTC last Friday, February 17, Kapunan said.

It is the turn of Ibuna’s camp to testify before the RTC on Monday.

Kapunan said Aleli has not participated in the case in London because it “has no jurisdiction over (Filipino) citizens or competence on (Philippine) laws.”

“Any claim on estate must be brought before (a Philippine) court in due time – not now,” Kapunan added without elaborating.

Ibuna’s camp

On the other hand, Ibuna’s lawyer, Leonard de Vera, cited Article 307 of the Civil Code in upholding his client’s claims.

“The funeral shall be in accordance with the expressed wishes of the deceased,” Article 307 says.

A will supposedly left by Arroyo gives Ibuna, instead of Aleli, the rights over his remains. The will is part of the evidence presented in London. 

Bago mo ibigay ang karapatan sa asawa na mag-decide, alamin mo muna kung merong ipinahayag na kagustuhan ang namatay,” De Vera said in an interview aired on ABS-CBN’s TV Patrol. (Before you give the wife the right to decide, know first if the deceased had an expressed will.)

Meanwhile, Ibuna’s brother, Rommel, spoke to the media for the first time on Friday, February 17. “‘Yung kapatid ko po, hindi niya gustong tumagal ito unnecessarily,” Rommel said. (My sister doesn’t want this to be prolonged unnecessarily.)

Arroyo, also known as Jose Pidal, died in London last January 26. – Rappler.com  

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!
Avatar photo

author

Paterno R. Esmaquel II

Paterno R. Esmaquel II, news editor of Rappler, specializes in covering religion and foreign affairs. He finished MA Journalism in Ateneo and MSc Asian Studies (Religions in Plural Societies) at RSIS, Singapore. For story ideas or feedback, email pat.esmaquel@rappler.com