Court orders review of graft charges vs 3 PDAF accused

Buena Bernal

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Court orders review of graft charges vs 3 PDAF accused
The cases of Laarni Uy, Rodrigo Galang, and Hernani Ditchon are remanded to the Ombudsman for yet another probe

MANILA, Philippines – The anti-graft court Sandiganbayan’s 3rd division ordered the reinvestigation of graft charges against 3 of the co-accused of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile in the pork barrel scam.

This was announced by 3rd division clerk of court Dennis Pulma in a press conference Friday, July 25.

In a July 21 minute resolution issued by the court, the cases of Laarni Uy, Rodrigo Galang, and Hernani Ditchon were remanded to the Ombudsman for yet another probe. 

The Ombudsman was directed to submit the results of its new probe 30 days upon its receipt of the order.

Napoles links

Court records from the 1st and 5th divisions show Uy is an employee of JLN Corporation, owned by alleged scam mastermind Janet Lim Napoles. 

Uy is likewise a co-accused in a number of graft cases against Senators Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr and Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada, whose cases are being heard by the 1st and 5th divisions respectively. She has already posted bail in both divisions.

Galang and Ditchon are likewise private individuals accused in the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) scam for being officers of Napoles-controlled non-governmental organizatons used to divert funds to projects that were supposedly non-existent. 

With no known addresses, the 3 were not served the Ombudsman’s November 19 order requiring them to answer the charges against them.

The 3 were denied their rights to due process, as they were not able to defend themselves during the first preliminary investigation by the Ombudsman. 

The preliminary investigation – meant to determine if there is probable cause to file their cases in court – proceeded even without their counter-affidavits, as their failure to submit controverting evidence was deemed by the Ombudsman a waiver of their right to submit evidence.

Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang and Justice Alex Quiroz eventually sided with Justice Samuel Martires, who voted on July 4 to have the cases against the 3 private individuals reinvestigated.
 
At the time, Martires likewise voted for the production of additional evidence against another 8 of the accused – including the children of alleged scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles – and for the dismissal of the graft case against one accused. (READ: Court acts as fiscal and judge of Napoles’ children – lawyer)

It was the Office of the Ombudsman – tasked to investigate and prosecute erring public officers – that filed before the court plunder and graft cases in relation to the diversion of lawmakers’ PDAF or pork barrel to ghost government projects.

Ombudsman’s bias

During the bail hearing of Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr, lawyer Stephen David aired his concern about the “Ombudsman’s bias.”

Legal counsel for Napoles, David said there were also private individuals who falsified documents for the scam but were not charged in court. These include supposed relatives of PDAF scam state witness Benhur Luy.

Ang dami kasi nila pinatawag sa Ombudsman na witness. Yung ayaw kumampi sa kanila, kinasuhan ng kaso. Yung sumama sa kanila, hindi nila kinasuhan,” he said in a chance interview with reporters Thursday.

(There were a lot of witnesses called to the Ombudsman. They filed cases against those who refused to side with them. Those who agreed, they did not.)

Ganoon ba ang pag-iimbestiga? Pag ayaw kumampi sa iyo, kakasuhan? (Is that how you investigate? If they don’t want to side with you, you file a case against them?)” he asked. – Rappler.com

 

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!