Did Uber misrepresent data to promote ride safety?

Victor Barreiro Jr.

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Uber reportedly deletes an earlier data blog post about spurious correlations between Uber use in areas with prostitution, alcohol, theft, and burglary in San Francisco
UBER. Uber signage in front of their headquarters in San Francisco, California, USA, 14 November 2014. File Photo by John G. Mabanglo/EPA

MANILA, Philippines – A communication professor is taking to task car-sharing service Uber for allegedly misrepresenting data to promote the safety of Uber rides in dangerous areas of San Francisco – and then taking down the said post.

Gina Neff, an associate professor of communication at the University of Washington and the School of Public Policy at Central European University in Budapest, said on Monday, November 24, the Uber Data Blog post – now deleted – is archived with the title “How crime location knowledge is a proxy for Uber demand.”

Its original web address, however, points to another possible title: “How prostitution and alcohol make Uber better.” 

 


In her tweets, Neff called the blog post spurious, as it showed a “correlation between prostitution and ridership.”


A VentureBeat report explained that Uber’s data team took a “lighthearted look at how Uber’s own ride data mashes up with local crime statistics,” using San Francisco’s Crimespotting Map to best determine when and where demand for an Uber ride is likely to occur.

Uber’s findings, according to their post: “Areas of San Francisco with the most prostitution, alcohol, theft, and burglary also have the most Uber rides. Be safe, Uberites!”

Following this claim, the Uber data team went off-tangent by noticing that a rise in prostitution arrests in San Francisco and Oakland appear to happen on the second Wednesday of the month. It’s a point they reasoned out as stemming from Social Security and welfare checks arriving on the second, third, and fourth Wednesdays of the month.

Neff added in a tweet, “Which Uber mistakes offend me most: misogyny, recklessness with user data, or spurious correlations masquerading as #bigdata? #CantDecide.”



Neff said she began looking through Uber’s archives after hearing about another post that reportedly went missing, called “Rides of Glory,” which appeared to track the possibility of one-night stands being done with Uber’s help.

Marketplace.org summarizes it, saying that an examination of their rider data – sorting for people who took an Uber between 10 pm and 4 am on a Friday or Saturday and then took another Uber ride 4 to 6 hours later from around the previous night’s drop-off point – pointed to potential one-night stands occurring and facilitated by Uber.

Uber has been under fire in recent weeks after reports of one of its executives suggesting Uber investigate journalists to fight back against negative press, with another Uber executive being investigated for privacy violations after reportedly accessing a journalist’s personal Uber ride data without that journalist’s consent. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!
Person, Human, Sleeve

author

Victor Barreiro Jr.

Victor Barreiro Jr is part of Rappler's Central Desk. An avid patron of role-playing games and science fiction and fantasy shows, he also yearns to do good in the world, and hopes his work with Rappler helps to increase the good that's out there.