Sri Lanka’s dark horse candidate in papal race

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Sri Lanka's Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith may have an edge over the other asian contenders to be the next Pope.

NEXT POPE? Sri Lanka's cardinal Albert Malcolm Ranjith Patabendige Don (L) and Mexican cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera arrive for an afternoon meeting of pre-conclave on March 8, 2013 at the Vatican. The day before, the next pope's ideal profile began to take shape as cardinals held a second day of pre-conclave talks -- a man with pastoral experience, missionary energy and few ties to the Vatican's unruly government. AFP PHOTO / FILIPPO MONTEFORTE

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka – Sri Lanka’s Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith heads the Catholic church in a predominantly Buddhist nation, but a stint in the Vatican has made him a long-shot candidate to be the next pope.

A stern traditionalist, Ranjith was appointed by the outgoing Benedict XVI to oversee the church’s liturgical practices in 2005, having previously served as papal nuncio, or ambassador, to Indonesia and East Timor.

With Forbes magazine last month including him among possible papal contenders, the international spotlight has fallen on Sri Lanka’s second-ever cardinal.

The charismatic Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle of the Philippines is the name most often mentioned by Vatican observers as a possible first Asian pope.

But at 65, Ranjith is a decade older than the Filipino, a factor which, together with his ideological leanings, could work in his favour.

Ranjith received his early education at boys’ schools in Colombo, before undertaking biblical studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. He has also studied in Rome and speaks fluent Italian, a must for a pope.

In 2005, he took up the Vatican post as the Secretary General of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, gaining access to the inner workings of the Holy See.

Soon after becoming the Archbishop of Colombo in 2009, Ranjith banned lay preachers and banished cultural practices borrowed from other religions from Sri Lanka’s Roman Catholic Church — moves which critics called backward-looking.

“You have to look at his actions in the right context,” Benedict Joseph, his spokesman told AFP.

“Things were getting out of hand and sometimes even the Good Friday service clashed with sermons of laymen. That is why he issued the guidelines in 2009 to ensure that Catholic religious traditions were maintained without any dilution.”

He was named as a cardinal in 2010, only the second in a country with a large Buddhist majority and where Christians account for fewer than 1.5 million out of a population of 20 million.

But he soon emerged as a strong personality among Sri Lanka’s religious leaders.

He led an inter-faith group to campaign for the restoration of European Union trade concessions that had been withdrawn because of Sri Lanka’s failure to improve its human rights record.

However, the clerics failed to convince the EU which insisted on Colombo delivering on promises to clean up its act after decades of ethnic bloodshed which claimed up to 100,000 lives, according to UN estimates.

Despite his closeness to Sri Lanka’s political establishment, he announced a surprise boycott of all state functions in 2011 to protest against a police raid of an orphanage run by Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity nuns.

The state dropped the case and the authorities issued an apology as Ranjith won the admiration of many for standing up for the charity which had been wrongfully accused of selling babies born to unwed mothers.

He also used his influence to attempt ethnic reconciliation in the country. A minority of Sinhalese and ethnic Tamils are Catholics, giving the church access to both communities in the ethnically divided nation.

Being of the majority Sinhalese ethnic group, he worked with minority Tamil bishops to arrange brief ceasefires at the height of fighting between troops and Tamil rebels — attracting criticism in some quarters.

Ranjith told an interviewer after the end of the war in 2009 that the church was misunderstood over its role in the conflict, with Sinhalese thinking the church sided with the Tamils while Tamils thought it was soft on the government.

“Our role has attracted criticism from extremists who have begun to consider us almost as traitors,” Ranjith had said in an interview conducted by a Vatican priest.

“But people of goodwill have appreciated and still appreciate our work. And that is the most important thing.” – AFP/Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!