Japan says Chinese ships in disputed waters

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

SENKAKU. A file picture dated 27 April 2005 shows an aerial view of Uotsuri Island, one of the disputed Senkaku islands in the East China Sea. Hiroya Shimoji/EPA

TOKYO, Japan – (UPDATED) Two Chinese coastguard ships sailed through disputed waters off Japan-administered islands in the East China Sea Saturday, May 31, officials said, as the United States warned Beijing over increasing territorial assertiveness.

The Japanese coastguard said the vessels entered the 12-nautical-mile band of territorial waters around one of the Senkaku islands, which China also claims and calls the Diaoyus, around 10:00 am (0100 GMT).

The two ships moved out of the zone about three hours later, it added.

China confirmed two coastguard vessels had “patrolled” the area on Saturday, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

Chinese vessels and aircraft have regularly approached the East China Sea archipelago – thought to harbor natural resources – since Tokyo nationalized some of the islands in September 2012, setting off the latest spate of incidents in a long-running territorial dispute.

Saturday’s incursion was the first of official Chinese vessels into the disputed waters since May 2 and the 12th this year.

China is also locked in territorial disputes, in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims almost entirely.

There have been incidences of Vietnam and China ramming each other’s vessels recently while in 2012 the Philippines lost control of rich fishing grounds after a tense standoff with China.

Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam – claim parts of the sea, with Manila and Hanoi being the most vocal in opposing China’s claims. Taiwan is also a claimant.

At the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore Saturday, US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel accused China of “destabilizing actions” in the South China Sea.

He also warned that Washington would not “look the other way” if international order is threatened. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!