rice tariffication law

NFA workers ask court to block layoffs due to rice tariffication

Ralf Rivas

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

NFA workers ask court to block layoffs due to rice tariffication

Imported rice from Vietnam has arrived and are being unloaded and being readied for distribution at the NFA Warehouse in Quezon City. People have been lining up in NFA outlets waiting for supplies to sold at the markets. September 4, 2018.

Gerard Carreon

(UPDATED) The NFA Employees Association says they were not consulted by management over the layoffs, and union leaders appear to have been targeted

Workers of the National Food Authority (NFA) filed a petition before a regional trial court in Metro Manila, asking it to stop the agency’s reorganization which would cost them their jobs.

The NFA Employees Association (NFA-EA) accused the NFA of not consulting them properly over the job cuts, which had been expected when the rice tariffication law was implemented in 2019.

The law scrapped quantitative restrictions (QR) on rice in favor of higher tariffs, in a bid to tame skyrocketing prices of rice at that time. But it also effectively clipped the powers of the NFA, which regulated rice trade and collected fees under the QR regime.

With its tasks slashed to just keeping rice inventories and the like, the NFA moved to restructure its ranks and lay off over 1,000 of its employees.

The restructuring plan was created by Special Order AO-2020-08-006 last August and was approved earlier this September.

But workers said the management excluded them from discussions on the restructuring.

They also claimed the layoffs seemed to target high-ranking union officers, including NFA-EA national president Maximo Torda, national vice president Joewell Monreal, and National Capital Region chair Constancio Narito.

“The way the restructuring is being implemented severely weakens the ability of the union to check unfair and oppressive acts of NFA’s management,” the petition read.

They also argued that some positions were abolished even though the roles were not connected in any way to the functions removed by the rice tariffication law.

With the arguments raised, the NFA-EA urged the court to slap a temporary restraining order and writ of preliminary injunction against the NFA reorganization and render the move invalid.

The NFA has yet to release a statement on the union’s petition. – Rappler.com

Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story said the petition was filed before the Supreme Court. This has been corrected to a regional trial court.

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!
Tie, Accessories, Accessory

author

Ralf Rivas

A sociologist by heart, a journalist by profession. Ralf is Rappler's business reporter, covering macroeconomy, government finance, companies, and agriculture.