OPEC says NOPEC bill could put US overseas assets, personnel at risk

US assets and personnel overseas could be at risk if the country decided to pass a bill against OPEC, known as NOPEC, the head of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries told member states.

In a letter, seen by Reuters, Mohammad Barkindo encouraged member countries to engage with the US administration.

“It is essential that member countries reinforce diplomatic bilateral contacts with government officials in the US…and explain the disadvantages for the US should the NOPEC bill become law.”

“These disadvantages might include: weakening the immunity principle at a global level, putting at risk US interests overseas, and the protection for their personnel and assets,” the letter said.

A US House panel this week passed a bill to open OPEC to lawsuits for collusion in boosting petroleum prices, but it was uncertain whether the legislation would be considered by the full chamber.

The NOPEC bill, introduced by Representative Steve Chabot, a Republican, passed on a voice vote in the House Judiciary Committee.

Similar bills to crack down on OPEC when oil prices are on the rise have appeared in Congress without success for more than 20 years.

Barkindo also said other disadvantages of the bill might include undermining important trade and energy relations between the United States and member states and it could “increase the risk of volatility of the international oil markets, which directly affects US oil-producing states and corporations.”

Letters from OPEC’s secretariat to members are fairly common and are part of due diligence of events that may impact global energy consumers and producers.

The letter said the bill could lead to fines on OPEC members and its national oil companies, which could be collected through seizure of assets on US territory or elsewhere.

It said the Vienna-based secretariat would resume monthly reports on the bill’s progress, call a legal team meeting to brainstorm possible actions, and gain a better understanding of the new US administration’s position on the bill. – Rappler.com