SUMMARY
This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.
MANILA, Philippines – Declassified documents from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) reveal the court’s justifications for upholding the constitutionality of the US National Security Agency’s collection of phone call data for anti-terrorism purposes.
According to the 29-page opinion signed by judge Claire V. Egan of the FISC, the collection of call details is justified if such data collected is relevant to an investigation into known (or unknown) terrorist threats who could be in the US.
The Washington Post cites another portion of the court’s opinion, saying that the government only needs to show “reasonable grounds to believe” those records would be useful in an investigation.
Relying on a 1976 ruling from Smith v. Maryland, part of the opinion notes how, due to a third party (telephone companies) transmitting the signal of callers to other people, callers cannot expect total privacy. They also added that the government isn’t searching for that number specifically; rather, they are only collecting data in bulk.
One additional twist presents itself in this opinion. Wired explains that telephone companies did not challenge these requests, with one notable passage saying, “To this date, no holder of records who has received an Order to produce bulk telephony metadata has challenged the legality of such an Order.”
No disputes were reportedly made despite a mechanism for doing so being available to companies receiving these data request orders. – Rappler.com
Add a comment
How does this make you feel?
There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.