DBM: Enough funds in 2016 budget for RH law
MANILA, Philippines – Amid the ongoing word war between lawmakers and reproductive health (RH) advocates on the removal of a P1-billion ($20.90 million) allocation for contraceptives, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) clarified that there are enough funds in the 2016 budget for the implementation of the RH law.
"There is enough funding to satisfy the 2016 budgetary requirements of the Reproductive Health Law. At the very least, the Department of Health can draw P900 million from a number of fund sources to procure Family Planning Commodities in 2016," Budget Secretary Florencio Abad said in a statement on Friday, January 15.
The sources of the fund include:
- P337.5 million ($7.05 million) - from the 2015 budget of the Department of Health's (DOH) Family Health and Responsible Parenting (FHRP) program
- P300 million ($6.27 million) - from the P2.28-billion ($47.66 million) appropriation of FHRP in the 2016 budget
- P300 million ($6.27 million) - savings from the 2015 budget
Abad explained that the DOH can supplement funding for family planning commodities from within the line item of the FHRP in the 2016 budget. This explains the first P300 million.
As for the other P300 million, DOH "has historically managed to generate savings amounting to 16%-17% of their budget every year," Abad said.
This amount is lower than the P8.8-billion ($183.96 million) savings earlier projected by Senator Loren Legarda which she said is "more than enough to cover the P1-billion decrease."
But the total of P937.5 million ($19.6 million) cited by DBM is still lower than the P1-billion allocation supposedly meant to purchase family planning commodities for the RH needs of millions of Filipinos, especially women.
Legarda's fellow lady senators Pia Cayetano and Miriam Defensor-Santiago also criticized Congress for allowing the "illegal" and "immoral" budget cut. (READ: Pia Cayetano: Difficult to trust Legarda again after RH budget cut)
But Legarda, chair of the Senate committee on finance, has repeatedly defended the removal of the P1 billion, along with another member of the bicameral conference committee on the 2016 budget, Senator Vicente "Tito" Sotto III.
In defending the cut, Sotto, a staunch RH critic, cited the temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by the Supreme Court on the distribution and sale of implants.
The TRO also temporarily prohibits the health department from granting any pending application for RH commodities. – Rappler.com
US$1 = P47.84
In these changing times, courage and clarity become even more important.
Take discussions to the next level with Rappler PLUS — your platform for deeper insights, closer collaboration, and meaningful action.
Sign up today and access exclusive content, events, and workshops curated especially for those who crave clarity and collaboration in an intelligent, action-oriented community.
As a bonus, we’re also giving a free 1-year Booky Prime membership for the next 200 subscribers.
You can also support Rappler without a PLUS membership. Help us stay free and independent by making a donation: https://www.rappler.com/crowdfunding. Every contribution counts.