Court of Appeals approves phaseout of 15-year-old buses
Court of Appeals approves phaseout of 15-year-old buses
The court upholds the constitutionality of two government orders mandating the phaseout of 15-year-old buses, citing public safety

MANILA, Philippines – The Court of Appeals (CA) upheld the government’s phaseout of 15-year-old buses, rejecting a petition questioning two orders imposing an age limit on buses.

The appellate court’s 12th Division upheld the constitutionality of Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) Order No. 2002-30, which mandates the phaseout of 15-year-old buses, and Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) Resolution No. 2013-001, which mandates the strict implementation of the DOTC order.

The National Confederation of Transport Workers and other transport groups had filed a petition seeking to declare these orders unconstitutional for violating the equal protection clause and due process.

But the CA denied the petition, saying the government’s police power to regulate public utility vehicles in the interest of public safety was valid.

“This court recognizes the aim of the transport officials concerned to establish a modern transport system intended to make the public more safe and secure while commuting,” it said.

“The reason is obvious: life is irreplaceable, property is not. When the State’s exercise of police power clashes with a few individuals’ right to property, the former should prevail,” it added.

Citing the number of vehicular accidents, the court also said: “While we truly commiserate with the plight of the petitioners who are affected by the assailed issuances, we cannot legally bar respondents DOTC and LTFRB from exercising their mandate of crafting and achieving the effective implementation of a comprehensive and rationalized national land transport plan.”

The appellate court also denied petitioners’ argument that the DOTC and LTFRB orders violate the equal protection clause by giving special treatment to public utility jeepneys.

The CA said that buses and jeepneys do not fall under the same category. 

The 18-page ruling was penned by Associate Justice Maria Elisa Sempio Diy, with Associate Justices Ramon Bato Jr and Manuel Barrios concurring.

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.