Proposed agriculture dep’t budget lower by P3 billion

Patty Pasion
Proposed agriculture dep’t budget lower by P3 billion
(UPDATED) This mainly due to slashed budget for the Office of the Secretary. Proposed allocations for programs and attached agencies in 2017 are significantly higher than the approved budget in 2016.

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – Despite President Rodrigo Duterte’s promise to revive agriculture, the proposed budget of the Department of Agriculture (DA) for 2017 is P3 billion less than its current funding. 

For next year, DA has proposed a total budget of P50,553,834,000. This is 6% lower than 2016’s P53,974,476,000 and nearly 30% less the P71 billion budget that Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel Piñol submitted to Malacañang.

“We presented a bigger budget, one which would include rice seeds and fertilizers for the rice farmers for the next 3 years because they suffered much from El Niño. That program is called RIGHT – it targets rice self sufficiency by 2019 had it been granted, but it was not. We have to work with whatever we have,” Piñol said during his agency’s budget briefing with members of the House of Representatives on Thursday, August 25.

Achieving rice self-sufficiency is on top of DA’s priorities with the primary objective of making food available to the people. 

“[We have] coupled food production with poverty alleviation,” said the agriculture chief. “[We] focus on rice [because] climate change has made everything unpredictable… We cannot depend on importing rice because even Thailand and Cambodia have their own shares of calamities.”

The agency’s budget proposal was slashed heavily because it was the ceiling set by the cabinet’s Finance Team given the “absorption rate and expenditure efficacy” of DA.

“The DA under the previous administration was not able to absorb and spend all of its money. In fact, when I took over, about P7 billion was left unspent in the 2015 budget,” Piñol explained in a Facebook post on Friday, August 26.

 

More for programs

Although DA has a lower budget proposal for next year, funding for most of the programs and attached agencies has increased, probably as a result of a big slash from the budget of the Office of the Secretary.

From a total budget of P40.3 billion in 2016, the office’s expenditure for 2017 is now limited to P35.2 billion – over P5 billion lower.

  2016 GAA   2017 NEP
Office of the Secretary 40,326,513,000 35,231,593,000
Attached Agencies 8,120,963,000 9,335,007,000
Attached Corporations (subsidy) 4,395,404,000 4,876,366,000
Automatic Appropriations 1,131,596,000 1,110,868,000
TOTAL 53,974,476,000 50,553,834,000

 

Funds to be allocated for attached agencies and subsidy for corporations are significantly higher than this year.

Of the 7 attached agencies of the DA, 6 see an increase in the budget proposal. Only the Philippine Carabao Center’s funds were reduced by P50.86 million. The Agricultural Credit Policy Council (ACPC) had the biggest budget increase: more than P768 million from 2016.

ATTACHED AGENCIES 2016 GAA 2017 NEP
Agricultural Credit Policy Council 43,035,000 811,203,000
Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources 6,702,613,000 6,962,058,000
National Meat Inspection Services 267,436,000 393,218,000
Philippine Carabao Center 470,672,000 419,810,000
Philippine Center for Post-harvest Development and Mechanization 237,898,000 308,650,000
Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries 168,054,000 181,611,000
Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority 231,255,000 258,457,000
ATTACHED CORPORATIONS    
National Daily Authority 190,472,000 189,945,000
Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation 1,600,000,000 2,500,000,000
Philippine Fisheries Development Authority 288,627,000 224,800,000
Philippine Rice Research Institute 518,000,000 561,000,000
Sugar Regulatory Administration 1,798,305,000 1,400,621,000

 

ACPC oversees the policies and programs that will support the DA’s priorities. Among Piñol’s goals is to make credit easily accessible to poor farmers.

Meanwhile, the Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation also had a steep increase among the DA’s attached corporations. From P1.6 billion in 2016, the agency now has a proposed budget of P2.5 billion.

PCIC is a public firm that protects farmers from damage or loss of non-crop agricultural assets, such as machinery, equipment and transport facilities.

DA has also included the provision for post-harvest facilities in its list of strategies to increase competitiveness.

The Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization, which handles agricultural modernization, also has a significantly higher budget, with P308.6 million from P237.8 million in 2016.

Meanwhile, 7 out of 8 program items listed in the department’s budget briefer saw an increase in their proposed budget. These includes the programs that aim to boost production for rice, livestock, corn, high-valued crops, organic produce, among others. 

  2016 GAA 2017 NEP
National Rice Program 7,062,293,000 9,735,779,000
National Livestock Program 1,172,565,000 1,537,453,000
National Corn Program 2,249,424,000 2,826,854,000
National High Value Crops Program 2,918,639,000 3,968,179,000
Organic Agriculture Program 634,998,000 817,936,000
Farm-to-Market Road Network Planning 153,960,000 58,864,000
Plant and Animal Regulation Services 785,763,000 1,028,308,000
Other Activities 2,444,723,000 4,198,715,000

“We will make food available to the people. We will focus on rice, corn, chicken, meat, milk and dairy products, fish and marine products, and fruits,” Piñol said during Thursday’s briefing.

“We [also] want to increase [the] income of farmers [by focusing] on generating high-valued crops, such as banana, coconut, pineapple, cacao, coffee, oil palm, abaca, fish and marine products, seaweeds, pork, spices, essential oils, tropical fruits, halal chicken, and organic vegetables,” he said. – Rappler.com 

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Patty Pasion

Patty leads the Rappler+ membership program. She used to be a Rappler multimedia reporter who covered politics, labor, and development issues of vulnerable sectors.