Negros Oriental gov hits Ombudsman for delay in corruption case
MANILA, Philippines – Negros Oriental Governor Roel Degamo is pulling all the stops to have his corruption cases dropped.
After filing a graft complaint against Ombudsman officials before the Department of Justice (DOJ), Degamo is now seeking a dismissal of his charges before the anti-graft court Sandiganbayan because of supposed inordinate delay.
Degamo is facing 11 counts of malversation and one count of graft for his misuse of calamity funds in 2012. Degamo is accused of proceeding with funding P143 million worth of infrastructure projects even after the budget department disallowed it because of non-compliance to guidelines.
Degamo on Thursday, March 30, filed a motion before the anti-graft court seeking to dismiss his charges for inordinate delay in the Ombudsman’s investigation.
According to Degamo, the complaint against him was filed before the Ombudsman in October 2013 but that the Ombudsman only finished investigation in May 2016.
“The Office of the Ombudsman took its own sweet time to terminate the preliminary investigation and lodge the information in court, unmindful of the fact that in the interim, accused had to endure the agony of an uncertain future, akin to having the proverbial sword of Damocles hanging over their heads,” Degamo said in his motion.
Section 16, Article III of the Constitution affords the accused the right to a “speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-judicial or administrative bodies.”
Several Supreme Court (SC) rulings have also affirmed that a case may be dismissed if there was inordinate delay, which can be determined by 4 factors: length of delay, reasons for the delay, assertion of failure to assert such right by the accused, and the prejudice caused by the delay.
The doctrine of inordinate delay has been used by respondents to have their charges dropped.
The Sandiganbayan has ruled on these cases on a case-to-case basis. In February of this year alone, the Sandiganbayan approved an inordinate delay charge by a respondent, but thumbed down the same appeal of another.
It dismissed the graft charge against former Surigao del Sur representative Jesnar Falcon and his son Peter Paul Jed Falcon due to inordinate delay by the Ombudsman, but affirmed the charges against former Commission on Elections chairman Benjamin Abalos S, saying there was no inordinate delay.
According to Degamo, he diligently cooperated with the preliminary investigation and filed all that was required of him within the prescribed period.
“There was nothing extraordinary in this case that would justify almost 3 years of preliminary investigation,” Degamo said.
Degamo has been dismissed twice over the same offense but in as many times secured a temporary restraining order (TRO) from the Court of Appeals (CA).
On Wednesday, March 29, he sought the help of the DOJ to investigate what he said was “manifest partiality” on the part of the Ombudsman when it proceeded with the cases against him even though he should have been absolved by virtue of the now-abolished Aguinaldo doctrine. – Rappler.com
In these changing times, courage and clarity become even more important.
Take discussions to the next level with Rappler PLUS — your platform for deeper insights, closer collaboration, and meaningful action.
Sign up today and access exclusive content, events, and workshops curated especially for those who crave clarity and collaboration in an intelligent, action-oriented community.
As a bonus, we’re also giving a free 1-year Booky Prime membership for the next 200 subscribers.
You can also support Rappler without a PLUS membership. Help us stay free and independent by making a donation: https://www.rappler.com/crowdfunding. Every contribution counts.