DOJ panel takes Andy Bautista’s cases from city prosecutors
MANILA, Philippines – Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II has ordered 3 city prosecutors’ offices to transfer to the Department of Justice (DOJ) cases that former elections chairman Andres Bautista filed against his estranged wife Patricia, as well as cases filed by Bautista’s friend lawyer Nilo Divina.
In Department Order No. 033 signed on January 24, Aguirre asked the Office of the City Prosecutor (OCP) of Taguig, Manila and Quezon City to transfer to the DOJ seven cases, 3 of which are libel complaints filed by Divina unrelated to Bautista.
Manila's Office of the City Prosecutor confirmed the order, and said they were already in the process of transfering records.
Aguirre created a 3-man panel led by Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Rassendell Rex F. Gingoyon, with Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Olive Torrevillas and Associate City Prosecutor Laurence Joel Taliping to take over the investigation.
“The concerned City Prosecution Offices shall inhibit the conduct of the preliminary investigation and immediately transfer the complete records of the above-mentioned cases to the Department of Justice,” the order said.
“We have expressed concerns on the DOJ’s impartiality. Transferring these cases directly before the DOJ only heightens our reservations,” said Anel Diaz, lawyer of Bautista.
The cases being transferred to the DOJ are:
- Patricia Bautista vs Andres Bautista for violation of the Anti-Violence Against Women and their Children Act of 2004 (From Taguig OCP)
- Andres Bautista and Susan Bautista-Afan vs Patricia Bautista and Atty Lorna Kapunan for grave coercion, robbery, qualified theft and grave threat/light threat (From Taguig OCP) (READ: Lawyer Lorna Kapunan says Chairman Bautista 'scared' of her)
- Andres Bautista vs Patricia Bautista vs Lorna Kapunan for violation of the Cybercrime Law (From Taguig OCP)
- Divina Law and Atty Nilo Divina vs Patricia Bautista and Lorna Kapunan for libel and cyber libel (From Manila OCP)
- Atty. Nilo Divina vs Atty Lorna Kapunan for cyber libel and unjust vexation (From Manila OCP)
- Atty Nilo Divina vs Atty Lino Chris Kapunan for libel, unjust vexation and cyber libel (From Manila OCP)
- Atty Nilo Divina vs Atty Lorna Kapunan for libel and cyber libel (From Manila OCP)
The last 3 libel complaints filed by Divina against the Kapunans stem from the Atio Castillo hazing case. Divina is facing murder, perjury and anti-hazing violation complaints for alleged liability in the hazing rites that killed the freshman law student. The Kapunans are the Castillos’ lawyers.
Divina is the managing partner of the Divina Law Firm, which Patricia accused of paying commissions to her husband. These commissions are part of P1-billion worth of Bautista's alleged unexplained wealth that Patricia has exposed.
DOJ's taking over cases from city prosecutors’ offices are procedurally allowed, since the DOJ oversees all prosecutors.
“We find the order irregular considering that unrelated cases were included in the consolidation to one panel,” Diaz said.
Without confirming the order, the DOJ nevertheless said: "The DOJ maintains utmost impartiality in the disposal of all the cases filed before it. Any unfounded statement to the contrary is most unfair to the good prosecutors of the Department."
Diaz said they will "formally seek reconsideration of the order." They have not been formally advised.
Divina declined to comment.