Latin America

Robredo: How can DOJ clear self-confessed drug lord Espinosa?

Robredo: How can DOJ clear self-confessed drug lord Espinosa?
Senators say the recommendation of a Department of Justice panel to drop charges against suspected drug lords Peter Lim and Kerwin Espinosa proves that the drug war is 'anti-poor' and a 'sham'

MANILA, Philippines –  Vice President Leni Robredo on Tuesday, March 13, raised the alarm over the “frightening” recommendation of a Department of Justice (DOJ) panel to drop charges against suspected drug lords Peter Lim and Kerwin Espinosa.

Robredo aired her concern in response to questions on the dropping of drug charges against Lim and Espinosa in a media interview on the sidelines of the ADP Women Empowerment and Gender Equality Talk in Makati City.

“Nakakatakot iyong dismissal ng kaso, kasi, unang-una, iyong isa self-confessed na drug pusher. In fact, isa pa nga siya sa mga testigo laban kay Senator [Leila] De Lima, sinasabing binibigyan nila ng pera out of drugs. Ano iyong gustong sabihin noon?” she said.

(The dismissal of the case is frightening because, first of all, one is a self-confessed drug pusher. In fact, he’s one of the witnesses against Senator De Lima, claiming he gave her drug money. What does that say?)

Robredo said the development is “unsettling” because it touches on two very important matters: rule of law and trust in institutions.

“Kung iyong DOJ pumipili ng isasampa na kaso o hindi, hindi base sa ebidensya kundi base sa sariling paniniwala, nakakatakot ito. Kasi, sabi ko nga, secondary na lang iyong mga personalities, pero iyong pinakamahalaga iyong institusyon. Kailangan tayong lahat nagtitiwala sa institusyon. Kung ganito iyong desisyon nila, magtatanong tayo kung kailangan pa bang pagtiwalaan iyong opisina,” she said.

(If the DOJ chooses which case to file or not, not based on evidence but based on what they believe, that’s frightening. As I’ve said, personalities are just secondary, but what’s most important is the institution. We have to trust the institution. If they make such decisions, we have to ask whether we still have to trust the office.)

Senator Grace Poe had the same question. She said she was “disturbed” by the DOJ recommendation as Espinosa himself had “admitted before a Senate inquiry that he was indeed involved in the drug trade.” 

“How a self-confessed drug lord like Kerwin Espinosa can be exonerated by the State is perplexing. It reflects the sloppiness of the police’s investigation and case buildup against these drug lords,” Poe said.

She said the prosecution should have used “the entire machinery of the State’s prosecution arm to gather more testimonial and object evidence, rather than lazily relying on this single witness,” whose testimony it had deemed as weak.

‘Weakened’ case vs De Lima

Senator Risa Hontiveros said in a statement that the DOJ panel’s decision “weakens” the case against De lima. (READ: Kerwin Espinosa: I gave P8M to De Lima through Ronnie Dayan)

“With the DOJ clearing Espinosa of any involvement with the illegal drug trade, it only follows that it also nullifies Espinosa’s charges against Senator De Lima,” she said.

“Thus, it is not farfetched that the other charges made by convicted druglords against Senator De Lima are also baseless. If Espinosa’s statement against Senator De Lima is not true, the same can be said of the other charges,” Hontiveros added.

She noted that the drug charges against De Lima were “based solely on the testimonies made by convicted and self-confessed drug lords who have everything to gain and nothing to lose.”

The Liberal Party (LP) reiterated its call to release De Lima, a member.

“The exoneration sheds any pretense of logic. If Kerwin Espinosa is not involved in drugs, then what reason remains for him to bribe Senator De Lima, as he claimed in his testimony? What reason remains for Senator De Lima to be in jail?” it said.

“We continue to assert that Leila de Lima is innocent. Her only crime was to hold government to account for human rights abuses and extra-judicial killings. We call for her immediate release,” the LP added.

Senators: Tokhang a sham

Senators said the DOJ panel’s recommendation  “proved” the Duterte’s administration’s war on drugs to be “anti-poor” and a “sham.”

“The dismissal of the said charges shows how duplicitous and a complete fraud the bloody drug war is. This latest development demonstrates how the Duterte government’s war on drugs is a sham,” said Hontiveros.

The senator noted that De Lima  had been “unjustly jailed” over drug charges, and thousands of mostly poor people had been killed in the drug war while big-time drug lords like Lim and Espinosa were “not only allowed to evade the long arm of the law but also cleared of any wrongdoing.”

“I guess it pays to be Kerwin or in the case of Mr Lim, the President’s kumpare,” Hontiveros said.

Duterte and Lim are principal sponsors at the wedding of Beatriz Amanda Borja, daughter of Fernando “Ding” Borja, president of Adnama Mining Resources Incorporated in June 2016. 

Senator Antonio Trillanes IV said, “The DOJ’s exoneration of these known druglords is yet another proof that what Duterte unleashed upon us is a fake drug war.”

“Kapag mahirap, walang tanong-tanong – patay agad. Kapag drug lords at kumpare pa ni Duterte, may due process na, absuwelto pa sa kaso. Kapag kay Senator De Lima, na kalaban sa pulitika, kahit nagkabuhol-buhol na ang mga scripted na testimonya, sampa agad sa korte para makulong. Mr Duterte, pinaglololoko mo ang taong bayan,” Trillanes said.

(In the case of poor people, no questions asked – they’re killed immediately. For drug lords and, of course, the kumpare of Duterte, you won’t only get due process, you’ll be exonerated as well. In the case of Senator De Lima, who is a political foe, even if the scripted testimony has become so twisted, a case was immediately filed in court to jail her. Mr Duterte, you’re fooling the people.)

Senator Francis Pangilinan said people allegedly found with a few grams of shabu are killed in the drug war while “influential people, the rich, and those implicated in the P6.4-million shabu smuggling remain free,” a view shared by Senator Paolo Benigno Aquino IV .

The LP said in a statement that the DOJ recommendation “highlights the administration’s poor record for due process and fair play.”

Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon, a former justice secretary, said he “cannot believe” that Justice Secretary Alexander Aguirre II was not consulted about the decision of the DOJ panel. The decision was made in December 2017, but the media only learned, and reported, about it on Monday, March 12.

“The President should review this, because the Office of the President has supervision and control over all Cabinet secretaries,” Drilon added.

The PNP filed a motion for reconsideration with the DOJ seeking to reverse the decision of the panel. – With reports from Camille Elemia /


Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.