Lorenzana sets conditions for joint ceasefire with communist rebels
MANILA, Philippines – Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana on Wednesday, April 4, set conditions for a possible bilateral ceasefire between the military and the communist New People's Army (NPA).
President Rodrigo Duterte on Tuesday, April 3, expressed openness to resuming peace talks with communist rebels. But he laid down several conditions, including a bilateral ceasefire agreement that would silence the guns until they have a final agreement to end the armed conflict. (READ: Joma to Duterte: We are ready to resume peace talks ASAP)
The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, the NPA, are behind Asia's longest running communist insurgency. Duterte promised to end the insurgency during his term, but talks have been on and off since last year.
Duterte's change of heart comes amid the military's claims that over 4,000 NPA combatants and supporters have surrendered to the government.
Lorenzana's terms: The defense chief said he wants the bilateral ceasefire agreement to prohibit the communist rebels from further committing "atrocities," expanding their "so-called influence areas," and collecting revolutionary taxes.
"Dapat walang galawan. Ang ceasefire na gusto namin, kaakibat na diyan 'yung hindi na sila mangongolekta ng ang tawag nila ay revolutionary tax. Pero ang tawag ko diyan ay extortion lang 'yan eh," Lorenzana said.
(There should be no movements. We want the ceasefire agreement to also prohibit the collection of what they call revolutionary taxes. I call it mere extortion.)
"No attacking of government troops. Hindi mangingidnap ng civilian o sundalo. At saka hindi na sila mag-atake ng puwersa natin at ng pulis. And no more expansion of so-called influence areas," he added.
(No attacking of government troops. They should stop abducting civilians and soldiers. They should stop attacking our forces and the police. And no more expansion of so-called influence areas.)
Lorenzana dismissed claims by CPP founding chairman Jose Maria Sison about a draft ceasefire agreement supposedly ready for signing last year. Sison is the chief political consultant of the National Democratic Front (NDF), the group representing the rebels in talks with the government.
"As far as we are concerned it doesn't exist kasi hindi namin nakita 'yun (because we haven't seen it)," the defense chief said.
If the peace talks do resume, Lorenzana said it is only reasonable to drop terror charges against the rebels and their supporters.
"Tignan natin kung ano maging result ng talks about resuming peace talks. Kung makikipag-usap tayo sa kanila, hindi siguro makatarungan that we tag them as terrorists kung may usapan na sinsero. Kung wala, we pursue the tag," he said.
(Let's see what happens to discussions about resuming peace talks. If we talk to them, I don't think it's right to tag them as terrorists if the talks are sincere. If they're not sincere, we pursue the tag.)
What's the DND and military position? Lorenzana, backed by the military, had taken a firm stand against resuming talks. He said he doesn't think the NPA supports the peace process, accusing the communist armed group of defying the NDF led by Sison.
Philippine military chief General Rey Guerrero on possible resumption of talks with communist rebels: "Ang masasabi ko lang,— Carmela Fonbuena (@carmelafonbuena) April 4, 2018
we've been here many times before." @rapplerdotcom pic.twitter.com/NhW7NGZ6tw
"It's a political decision. Whatever the position of the President will be, we will support.... Ang masasabi ko lang (The only thing I can say is), we've been here many times before. We know how to deal with the situation regardless," said Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) chief General Rey Guerrero.
With Duterte's pronouncement, Lorenzana said the rebels should "prove their sincerity."
"Sabi ko nga, kailangan magpakita ng sinseridad bago magpatuloy (They need to show sincerity before we resume negotiations). We are not closing doors to the peace talks," he said.
What's Lorenzana's concern about a ceasefire? The defense chief said it appears that the "ground" doesn't support NDF efforts to resume talks, the same allegation the previous Aquino administration also cited when it suspended talks with the rebels.
"Parang sinasabotahe nila. Kung mayroon mang balak makipag-usap ang gobyerno, sinasabotahe nila dito sa baba. Gusto siguro ng nakakataas nila na makipag-usap but sinasabotahe sa baba," Lorenzana said, citing "atrocities" committed by the NPA.
The communist rebels were recently blamed for the burning of heavy equipment in Davao City.
"Definitely, hindi nakakatulong 'yun (violence doesn't help)," said Guerrero. "How could you say you are talking peace if there is violence happening around you?"
Lorenzana said even presidential peace adviser Jesus Dureza doesn't think there is an "enabling environment" to resume talks.
"Ang question ko (My question is): Do they have control over their fighters on the ground? That is the question I was asking even before," the defense chief said.
"They need to prove na kaya nila rendahan ang tao nila sa baba. Kasi kung magkaroon ng ceasefire – bilateral – kailangan assured tayo na kaya nilang rendahan ang tao nila sa baba," he added.
(They need to prove that they can rein in their men on the ground. If we're going to have a bilateral ceasefire, we need to be assured that they can rein in their people.)
Why did the talks collapse? Talks were promising in 2016. The military and the NPA silenced their guns from August 2016 to February 2017 or a good 6 months when separate unilateral ceasefires were in place in support of the peace talks. (READ: The end of the affair? Duterte's romance with the Reds)
A prolonged ceasefire was unprecedented. An end to hostilities is typically expected only after a final agreement. But the rebels agreed after concessions from Duterte, including the release of supposedly high-ranking communist leaders from prison.
But the unilateral ceasefires separately declared by the military and the NPA became untenable because of the absence of common rules. A bilateral ceasefire is supposed to address this.
Both sides accused each other of abusing the ceasefire. While the military accused the NDF of expanding influence areas, the NDF accused the military of entering their supposed bailiwicks.
"Nakalamang sila. Tayo wala tayong nakuhang pakinabang doon (It was advantageous to them. We didn't get any benefit from the ceasefire)," Lorenzana said.
"Ang gusto namin bilateral ceasefire para mayroong mechanism to check who is violating what. Wala kami problema sa control sa tropa natin, even police at military, dahil we have this chain of command," he added.
(What we want is a bilateral ceasefire so there would be a mechanism to check who is violating what. We have no problems with control over our troops, the police and the military, because we have this chain of command.)
The NPA withdrew its ceasefire declaration in February 2017, but hoped for a "talk while fighting" scenario. This angered Duterte, and he scrapped the talks altogether. – Rappler.com
We keep you informed because you matter
We tell you the stories that matter. We ask, we probe, we explain.
But as we strive to do all this and speak truth to power, we face constant threats to our independence.
Help us make a difference through free and fearless journalism. With your help, you enable us to keep providing you with our brand of compelling and investigative work.
Joining Rappler PLUS allows us to build communities of action with you. PLUS members will receive our editorial newsletters and industry reports, get to join exclusive online conversations with our award-winning journalists, and be part of our monthly events.
Make your move now. Join Rappler PLUS.