14 senators file resolution urging SC to review Sereno ouster
MANILA, Philippines (2nd UPDATE) – Fourteen senators filed a resolution calling on the Supreme Court to review its decision granting the quo warranto petition and ousting Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.
Senate Resolution 738 was filed on Thursday, May 17, with the signatures of the following senators:
- Senate President Aquilino Pimentel III
- Senate President Pro-Tempore Ralph Recto
- Minority Leader Franklin Drilon
- Francis Pangilinan
- Loren Legarda
- Francis Escudero
- Antonio Trillanes IV
- Juan Edgardo Angara
- Paolo Benigno Aquino IV
- Grace Poe
- Leila de Lima
- Sherwin Gatchalian
- Risa Hontiveros
- Joel Villanueva
The 9 senators who did not sign or were unable to do so include:
- Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III
- Panfilo Lacson
- Gregorio Honasan II
- Manny Pacquiao
- Cynthia Villar
- Juan Miguel Zubiri
- Joseph Victor Ejercito
- Richard Gordon
- Nancy Binay
“[To] express the sense of the Senate of the Philippines to uphold the Constitution on the matter of removing a Chief Justice from office, and respectfully urge the Supreme Court to review its decision to nullify the appointment of Maria Lourdes Sereno as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines,” the resolution said.
The resolution, citing the 1987 Constitution, said the Supreme Court’s decision “sets a dangerous precedent that transgresses the exclusive powers of the legislative branch to initiate, try, and decide all cases of impeachment.”
“A fundamental doctrine of a republican government is the separation of powers of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government; and while this doctrine does not guarantee absolute autonomy in the discharge of functions of each branch, the corollary doctrine of checks and balances ensures their co-equality,” the resolution said.
“The Senate recognizes that the continued harmonious interdependence of these branches lies in the faithful adherence of each branch of government to the Constitution,” it added.
The Senate has to vote on the measure before it becomes the official stand of the chamber.
While the resolution was the minority bloc’s initiative, opposition senators said the issue is now beyond party lines as it already involves the Constitution.
Drilon earlier said that the resolution is meant “to inform the Supreme Court of the sentiment of the Senate insofar as the legal issue is concerned.”
Constitutional law experts, however, say that the Senate could only assert its jurisdiction by filing a petition before the Supreme Court, and not by passing a resolution.
The SC, voted 8-6, granted the quo warranto petition filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida. Sereno is set to file an appeal.
Pimentel earlier said the Senate's hands are tied in the impeachment, as the House has yet to transmit to them the articles of impeachment.
House leaders, meanwhile, said they would wait for the final SC decision, since Sereno is expected to appeal the ruling, before holding a plenary vote on the articles of impeachment.
SC justices who voted against the quo warranto petition had also argued that the High Court's decision set a bad precedent. In his dissenting opinion, Associate Justice Alfredo Caguioa likened the 8-6 Court vote as committing "seppuku," while Associate Justice Marvic Leonen said the ruling had made the SC "vulnerable." – Rappler.com