Impeachment complaints vs SC justices 'sufficient in form'
MANILA, Philippines – The House committee on justice on Tuesday, September 4, deemed the impeachment complaints against Supreme Court (SC) Chief Justice Teresita de Castro and 6 associate justices sufficient in form.
The House panel led by Oriental Mindoro 1st District Representative Salvador Leachon voted 21-0 in favor of the impeachment complaints' sufficiency in form, which were filed against De Castro and the following SC associate justices:
- Diosdado Peralta
- Lucas Bersamin
- Francis Jardeleza
- Noel Tijam
- Andres Reyes Jr
- Alexander Gesmundo
The complainants are Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman, Magdalo Representative Gary Alejano, and Ifugao Representative Teddy Baguilat Jr.
They are accusing all 7 SC justices of culpable violation of the Constitution when they voted in favor of the quo warranto petition filed against ousted chief justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, which nullified her appointment.
De Castro, Peralta, Bersamin, Tijam, and Jardeleza are also accused of betrayal of public trust for refusing to inhibit themselves from voting on the quo warranto petition after testifying against Sereno during the impeachment hearings against her conducted last year.
The justice committee agreed to consolidate the impeachment complaints based on similar grounds.
The panel then suspended the hearing to give time for the members to read all 7 impeachment complaints so they would be able to properly assess the sufficiency in substance.
The next hearing will be held next Tuesday, September 11.
Section 4, Rule III of the Rules of Procedure in Impeachment Hearings states that the justice committee must first determine whether an impeachment complaint is sufficient in form and substance before the complainants' arguments and evidence are thoroughly assessed during the rest of the hearings.
Villarin no longer a complainant
On Tuesday, the justice committee did not allow Akbayan Representative Tom Villarin to be a complainant of the impeachment complaints.
This is because he failed to sign the impeachment complaints when Lagman, Alejano, and Baguilat filed these on August 23.
"As you all know, I was not able to make it to that filing because of an emergency in Davao where I live. But I do have personal knowledge in the making of such complaint and as early as two months ago, I have been publicly telling through the media of my intent to file an impeachment complaint against [them]," said Villarin.
He then asked if he would be allowed by the committee to sign the impeachment complaints and also participate in the impeachment proceedings.
Lagman and Siquijor Representative Ramon Rocamora also tried to convince the panel to grant Villarin's request.
But Leachon refused and got the backing of the rest of the members.
Leachon said if they would allow Villarin to sign the impeachment complaints, it would mean the documents are unsigned pleadings and therefore just "mere scraps of paper."
Leachon added that even without Villarin's signature, the impeachment complaints will stand. – Rappler.com
We keep you informed because you matter
We tell you the stories that matter. We ask, we probe, we explain.
But as we strive to do all this and speak truth to power, we face constant threats to our independence.
Help us make a difference through free and fearless journalism. With your help, you enable us to keep providing you with our brand of compelling and investigative work.
Joining Rappler PLUS allows us to build communities of action with you. PLUS members will receive our editorial newsletters and industry reports, get to join exclusive online conversations with our award-winning journalists, and be part of our monthly events.
Make your move now. Join Rappler PLUS.