Trillanes may be forced to go to the Supreme Court
MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – Senator Antonio Trillanes IV may be forced to go straight to the Supreme Court (SC) to fight his arrest and challenge President Rodrigo Duterte’s proclamation that voided his amnesty from coup charges.
“The criminal court is not the proper forum to prove that the President’s proclamation was unfounded,” Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra told Rappler Tuesday night, September 4, when asked if Trillanes can present his proof to the Makati Regional Trial Court (RTC) that he has fulfilled his requirements for amnesty.
The amnesty of Trillanes was voided on two grounds: (1) he allegedly failed to file an official application and (2) he did not admit guilt. The senator contested the charge and said he had duly fulfilled them.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has applied for an alias warrant against Trillanes at Makati RTC Branch 148 which previously handled the coup charges.
Asked where the proper forum is to prove that his amnesty was valid, Guevarra said: “That’s for Trillanes’ counsel to find out, but not in the RTC.”
'Danger' with going to SC
In an earlier press conference, Guevarra tried to dodge a question on whether the SC is the proper court, and instead said: “Well I guess, any act of the government is subject to judicial review, to determine whether there’s grave abuse of discretion.”
“Of course there is always danger (in going straight to the Supreme Court) given the current composition and disposition of the SC,” said criminal law expert Alexander Padilla, who also represented detained Senator Leila de Lima in the SC.
“If I were given a choice, I will of course move first to quash the warrant from the court which issued the same just to comply with the procedural issues and if the decision is adverse, go up to the SC,” said Padilla.
Constitutional Law professor Dan Gatmaytan said that the factual issues of whether or not Trillanes fulfilled his requirements for his amnesty should be threshed out in the lower court.
“It is unlikely that the Supreme Court will hear this case given the fact that there are factual issues to be resolved. These would include whether Senator Trillanes complied with the conditions for an amnesty,” Gatmaytan told Rappler.
Edre Olalia of the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) said it’s a legal dilemma, because there is also the question of whether a new case should be filed against Trillanes at the RTC.
“If one raises it with the SC, will the public view with certainty that its decision is absolutely and solely based on the law and the merits or demerits of the case? The wisdom of these choices will only be proven correct a posteriori. At the end of it all, it is political,” Olalia said.
Guevarra said that the Makati RTC can only proceed to issue a warrant, and promulgate a decision on the coup charges, but not on the amnesty. Trillanes, if he wants, can ask Duterte for clemency, Guevarra said.
Trillanes’ lawyer Rey Robles said Tuesday night that they have not yet decided on what type of case to file and where, but that they would do so on Wednesday, September 5.
'Not a fad'
Trillanes' amnesty is the first one in recent memory to be declared void ab initio, meaning it was never valid from the start.
It is a case of first impression, just like the quo warrano ouster of former chief justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, which is the latest in the increasing list of winning cases for Solicitor General Jose Calida and the Duterte administration.
"It just so happened that all of these matters were invalid to begin with. It’s not a fad, I’m telling you it’s not a fad. Walang pattern nagkakataon lang 'yun. (There's no pattern, it's just a coincidence,)" Guevarra said.
Guevarra added: "It's not a question of political opposition, it is a matter of compliance with the law." – Rappler.com
Follow the developments here:
- Duterte revokes Trillanes’ amnesty ‘effective immediately’
- Trillanes vows to face arrest: ‘Mr Duterte, hindi ako takot sa iyo’
- Revocation of Trillanes’ amnesty ‘clear act of revenge’ – Alejano
- Trillanes amnesty revocation: ‘Duterte reinventing the law’
- DOCUMENT: Proclamation No. 572 voiding Trillanes' amnesty
- ‘Nothing political’ in Trillanes amnesty revocation, says Malacañang
- Trillanes amnesty ‘absolute, irrevocable’ – Lagman
- Noynoy Aquino says Duterte should 'respect, recognize' Trillanes amnesty
- Opposition senators to fight ‘illegal, abusive’ Duterte order vs Trillanes
- DOJ's Guevarra: Trillanes may ask Duterte for clemency
- Where is Trillanes' amnesty application? 'Hinahanap pa,' says DND
- Robredo: Trillanes amnesty revocation proves admin out to silence critics
- Calida evasive on role in voiding Trillanes amnesty
- Without amnesty, Trillanes' retirement voided too
- Panelo: State protecting itself from ‘political offender’
- After Duterte arrest order, Trillanes to stay in Senate for now
- DOJ applies for warrant and Hold Departure Order vs Trillanes
- Voided Trillanes amnesty appears to be 'attempt to silence dissent' – CHR
- Calida behind search for Trillanes' amnesty papers
- LOOK: Trillanes shows proof of amnesty application
- AFP on revocation of Trillanes’ amnesty: ‘Just following orders’
- Duterte voiding Trillanes' amnesty: Everything you need to know
- Lawmakers, parties hit 'cowardly' Duterte for voiding Trillanes' amnesty
In these changing times, courage and clarity become even more important.
Take discussions to the next level with Rappler PLUS — your platform for deeper insights, closer collaboration, and meaningful action.
Sign up today and access exclusive content, events, and workshops curated especially for those who crave clarity and collaboration in an intelligent, action-oriented community.
As an added bonus, we’re also giving a free 1-year Booky Prime membership for the next 200 subscribers.
You can also support Rappler without a PLUS membership. Help us stay free and independent by making a donation: https://www.rappler.com/crowdfunding. Every contribution counts.