SUMMARY
This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.
MANILA, Philippines – Malacañang said on Friday, December 7, that it respects the decision of the anti-graft court Sandiganbayan to acquit former senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr of plunder.
“Regardless of the sentiments to the contrary, we have to bow down to the judgement of the Sandiganbayan,” Presidential Spokesman and Chief Presidential Counsel Salvador Panelo said in a statement on Friday.
“We have consistently respected the independence of the Judiciary and we will continue to do so in this case as we implement the final orders of the anti-graft court on the matter,” he added.
Panelo, who once served as Revilla’s lawyer, described justice in the Philippines as “slow” but that court verdicts when handed down are “exacting, immutable.”
Earlier on Friday, the Sandiganbayan’s special first division ruled via majority vote that Revilla is not guilty of plunder. He was accused of earning P224.5 million worth of kickbacks through the pork barrel scam.
The court convicted Janet Lim Napoles and Richard Cambe of plunder, and ordered the return of P124.5 million to the Philippine treasury.
Revilla is among 3 former senators accused of funnelling his Priority Development Assistance Fund into fake non-governmental organizations owned by Napoles. The others are Juan Ponce Enrile and Jinggoy Estrada, both out on bail.
When he was still a presidential candidate in January 2016, President Rodrigo Duterte had said that he would “see to it” that Revilla would be granted bail if the evidence was “weak.” (READ: Duterte: If evidence is weak, let Bong Revilla out on bail) – Rappler.com
READ related stories:
- Sandiganbayan acquits Bong Revilla of plunder
- Sandiganbayan orders return of P124.5M in Revilla plunder case
- Ombudsman Martires: We will not appeal Revilla acquittal
- Bong Revilla released: ‘May hustisya pa sa ating bansa’
- Majority justices ’took the cudgels’ for Revilla – dissenter
- Cambe, Napoles could not have plundered millions without Revilla – dissenter
- ‘Forged signatures’ theory acquits Revilla in plunder case
- Aquino ‘bewildered’ by Bong Revilla acquittal
- ‘I hope to follow suit,’ says Jinggoy Estrada after Revilla acquittal
- Rundown of the trial: Is Bong Revilla guilty or not guilty?
- DOCUMENT: Dissenting opinions on Bong Revilla acquittal
- DOCUMENT: Sandiganbayan decision that acquits Bong Revilla of plunder
- TIMELINE: Bong Revilla’s plunder case and the pork barrel scam
- Sandiganbayan verdict on pork barrel scam: Bong Revilla not guilty | Midday wRap
- Updates on Bong Revilla’s acquittal | Evening wRap
- [ANALYSIS | Deep Dive]: Is Bong Revilla innocent?
Add a comment
How does this make you feel?
There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.