SUMMARY
This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.
One of the questions raised by Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago on Day 38 of the #CoronaTrial was whether the Ombudsman’s power to investigate public officials overrides the procedures stated in the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA). Santiago said that under AMLA, a bank inquiry can only be conducted after the AMLC first finds probably cause against an official – after which it must then file a complaint with the DOJ or the Office of the Ombudsman. In the case of Chief Justice Renato Corona, the Ombudsman went to the AMLC first. The powers of the Ombudsman and the AMLA, however, are based on two different laws – which raises the question, which one should be followed?
Find out on Rappler.com
Add a comment
How does this make you feel?
There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.