Drilon to Aquino: We need ‘full time,’ not OIC PNP chief

Bea Cupin
Drilon to Aquino: We need ‘full time,’ not OIC PNP chief
Citing the upcoming visit of Pope Francis and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meetings – LP stalwart and Senate President Franklin Drilon says an OIC at the helm of the PNP is not enough

MANILA, Philippines – Senate President Franklin Drilon on Friday, December 12, urged his partymate President Benigno Aquino III to “decide on the fate” of embattled Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Director General Allan Purisima.

Purisima, who was appointed PNP chief in December 2012, is currently serving a 6-month preventive suspension order issued by the Ombudman over an allegedly anomalous deal between the PNP and courier service Werfast.

While Purisima is suspended, the PNP is headed by Deputy Director General Leonardo Espina as officer-in-charge (OIC).

To Drilon, having an OIC head the 150,000-strong national police force is unacceptable given two major events in the country in 2015: the visit of Pope Francis and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Ministerial Meetings.

In a statement, Drilon cited two events that “require a full-time PNP chief to be on top of all security preparations.”

“In an organization such as the Philippine National Police where authority and leadership is strictly observed, Purisima’s suspension from his post would turn it into a ‘headless’ body,” said Drilon, a stalwart of the ruling Liberal Party (LP).

Drilon stopped short of urging the President to appoint an acting PNP chief.

Interior Secretary Manuel Roxas II, who chairs the National Police Commission (Napolcom), earlier said an OIC’s mandate was “vast,” including the reappointment of police officials.

But Drilon said an OIC has “limited power to effect changes and reforms in the PNP.”

Purisima, who was overseas when the suspension order was announced, has since “acknowledged” the order but has filed a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on the Ombudsman’s decision.

Purisima had also called “patently illegal” the Ombudsman’s order delegating the DILG to serve the suspension order since it is the Napolcom and not the DILG that has administrative control over the PNP.

Palace officials had earlier sought to assure the public that the performance of the PNP would not be affected by the suspension of its chief. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Bea Cupin

Bea is a senior multimedia reporter who covers national politics. She's been a journalist since 2011 and has written about Congress, the national police, and the Liberal Party for Rappler.