FACT CHECK: Did Grace Poe sign the coco levy bill?

The presidential bet says she only signed a committee report so that a consolidated bill could move forward for deliberation: 'Wala pang bill'

COCO LEVY. Presidential bet Grace Poe clarifies she only signed the committee report on the coco levy measure not the bill's approval. File Photo by Arnold Almacen

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – Presidential bet Grace Poe stood by her statement in the 2nd presidential debate that she did not sign the bill seeking to distribute coco levy funds to farmers, saying she only signed the committee report so the bill would move forward.

Poe is being called out for that statement, after a post circulating on social media alleged that Poe was being untruthful, as she supposedly signed the bill. As of posting time, the post was shared almost 4,000 times.

Rappler checked the circumstances surrounding the issue.

Poe is facing criticisms over her alleged defense of businessman Eduardo “Danding” Cojuangco Jr, who was among those behind the coco levy fund scam – the misuse of taxes imposed on coconut farmers – in the 1970s and 1980s. Cojuangco is a known supporter of Poe. (READ: NPC: Grace Poe is our presidential bet)

Poe earlier admitted she is renting or borrowing private aircraft from Cojuangco’s San Miguel Corporation, but assured the public she would not grant favors to her campaign supporters. (READ: Grace Poe is not Danding’s ‘puppet’ – Chiz)

In a sortie in Quezon, Poe blamed the government for the delay in the distribution of coco levy funds to farmers. She criticized the government for failing to “directly” give the money to coconut farmers, who are among the poorest in the country.

In fact, ang Supreme Court may desisyon na d’yan kung paano dapat i-release na ‘yan. Kaso ‘yung gobyerno natin meron pang ideya kung paano gagamitin ‘yun imbis na diretso na lamang at malinaw sa coco farmers,” Poe said on March 9.

(In fact, the Supreme Court had a decision on the how to release the funds. But our government had its own idea on how to use it instead of giving it directly to coconut farmers.) 

It turned out, the law needed for the High Court decision to be implemented was passed by the House of Representatives but not by the Senate, of which Poe is a member.

Critics said Poe is therefore accountable for the non-passage of the measure in the Senate.

The senator denied this.

The senator is also getting flak for saying in the debate that she is only a member of the committee. Poe is the vice chairperson of the Senate committee on agriculture.

Intent to question

While Poe said she did not sign the coco levy bill, Senate records show, and she admitted, that she signed Committee Report Number 106 “recommending” the approval of Senate Bill 2675 as the consolidated version to be deliberated upon by senators.

This means the committee report already included SB 2675, which consolidated all 4 similar measures filed separately by senators Cynthia Villar, Ralph Recto, and Paolo Benigno “Bam” Aquino IV.

Before the Senate approves a bill on final reading, it has to undergo 3 readings first. At present, the coco levy bill is still in the 2nd reading or the period of amendments.

“’Yon ay committee report. Wala pang bill ‘yon eh. Kasi, bilang vice chairman, para ‘yung committee report ay mapagdebatehan doon sa Senado ay kailangan mo munang ilabas ‘yung report na ‘yon. Hindi pa tapos,” Poe said in a chance interview on Monday, March 21, at the Baclaran Church.

(That’s a committee report. There’s no bill yet. Because, as a vice chairman, for a committee report to be deliberated on the Senate floor, you have to release the report first. It’s not yet done.)

The consolidated bill, SB 2675, is also known as Coconut Farmers and Industry Development Act of 2015 or “an act declaring the coconut levy assets as a trust fund, providing for its management and utilization, authorizing the Privatization and Management Office to dispose the coconut levy assets, and for other purposes.”

Poe, therefore, signed the committee report on the bill that seeks to mandate several government offices to manage coco levy funds for coconut farmers – the same mechanism she criticized in Quezon as she said she wanted the funds be directly given to farmers.

But that does not mean she agreed with the measure, she said. Poe asserted she only signed it so the process could move forward.

In past instances, however, Poe’s signatures in committee reports – the recommending of plunder charges against Vice President Jejomar Binay and the Mamasapano probe – signified her approval of them. If she had reservations or intentions to amend a measure, just as in the substitute Bangsamoro Basic Law, Poe clearly indicated it by putting a note beside her signature – a common practice among senators.

But out of all the signatories of the said report, only Senator Vicente Sotto III clearly expressed his intention to question the measure by putting the words “to interpellate” beside his signature. 

Senators also have the option of not signing the report at all, especially if they oppose it.

Asked by reporters if her signature on the committee report does not necessarily mean she is in favor of the measure, Poe said: “Meron kasi for amendments eh, ‘di ba, may mga iba din for amendments? Para sa akin kasi dapat naano ko doon ‘yung… Usually, ‘pag pumirma ka, magpapalista ka na magtatanong ka, na meron kang mga amendments doon sa report.”

(There are those for amendments, right? For me, I should have… Usually, when you sign, that means you are lining up to interpellate, that you have amendments to the report.)

Being careful

During Sunday’s debate, Poe reiterated that the questionable fund is no longer with Cojuangco, as it was already given to the government.

She said she did not sign the bill because she wanted to ensure that the funds would indeed go to coconut farmers and their family, which SB 2675 and the committee report are seeking to do.

“Ngayon, itong batas na ito ay dinedebate pa rin sa Senado. Hindi ko pinirmahan ang batas na ito sa simpleng pananaw lamang na kailangan may representasyon ang mga magsasaka, nagtatanim ng niyog,” she said on Sunday, March 20.

(Now, this measure is still being debated in the Senate. I did not sign it for the simple reason that farmers should have representation.)

Poe added: “Malinaw na ang pera na ito ay wala na kay Danding Cojuangco, at kahit nasa kanya pa man, ako ay magiging patas, tumulong ka man sa akin o hindi.”

(It is clear that these funds are no longer with Danding Cojuangco. Even if it were with him, I would be fair whether or not you helped me.)

Despite the noise and confusion, Poe stands by her earlier statement. Technicality dictates she could not sign a bill’s approval because it has not yet passed all the stages required: “Sasabihin sa akin, ‘Pinirmahan mo na ‘yung bill’ eh hindi pa nga natatapos ‘yung deliberasyon.’”

(They would tell me, “You already signed the bill when deliberations on it are not yet done.”)

She said she was just being careful in labelling the measure as a bill because what she signed was only a part of the process, a committee report.

“Pero alam ‘nyo, kung titingnan ‘nyo ‘yung record doon sa Senado, ako ay para sa ating mga magsasaka. Ang unang resolution ng 16th Congress ay para sa coconut farmers na na-file ko, kaya din nag-iingat akong mabuti na sabihin ‘Meron nang bill,’ kasi committee report lang ‘yon,” she said.

(That bill is not yet done. The deliberations are not yet finished. But, you know, if you will look at Senate records, I am for our farmers. The first resolution by the 16th Congress was for coconut farmers, which I filed. I am careful in saying there is already a bill because it is just a committee report.)

Poe said she already asked for her name to be included in the list of interpellators. It is unclear, however, if the chamber could still decide on the measure because time is running out. They are set to resume session on May 23 but mainly for the national canvassing of votes for the 2016 presidential elections.

The coco levy bill, among the priority measures of the Aquino administration, was only passed by the House of Representatives.  Rappler.com