House of Representatives

Lawmaker restricts access of Rappler reporter after story on Pharmally face shields

Rappler.com

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Lawmaker restricts access of Rappler reporter after story on Pharmally face shields

Pictured here is DIWA Representative Michael Aglipay and a screenshot of him removing Rappler reporter Rambo Talabong from a Viber group with reporters.

Rappler condemns in the strongest terms Representative Aglipay's act of removing Rappler from a media coordination channel that is every journalist’s right to access

House committee on good government and public accountability chairman Michael Aglipay unceremoniously removed Rappler journalist Rambo Talabong from a Viber group with reporters on Monday, September 27. 

Aglipay kicked out Talabong after the journalist wrote a story on the DIWA representative’s latest defense of the Duterte administration.

Aglipay’s comment was about the Senate hearing’s revelation that the production stickers on the face masks procured by the government from Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corporation were tampered. The tampering of the production stickers effectively also changed the expiry dates.  

For Aglipay, the changing of expiry dates was not a problem, as he asked a Department of Health (DOH) official if the alleged expired face masks hurt or killed any of the health workers who used them. DOH undersecretary Carolina Taino said no.

This exchange was the subject of Talabong’s story, which included a video excerpt on Aglipay’s interpellation during the good government and public accountability panel hearing. 

Lawmaker restricts access of Rappler reporter after story on Pharmally face shields

Aglipay then singled out Talabong during the hearing – even if CNN Philippines also published a similar article with the same angle.

The congressman argued Talabong’s article was “one-sided” as it did not include DOH Secretary Francisco Duque III’s remarks that the shelf life of face shields was 36 months. 

“So it is one-sided, and I’m calling him out to be balanced, because they are claiming to be a balanced organization, but this article of his never mentioned that Secretary Duque said that the shelf life is 36 months, and he only focused on my comment, making it appear that we are one-sided here, and covering up the government,” said the ally of Speaker Lord Allan Velasco.

Lawmaker restricts access of Rappler reporter after story on Pharmally face shields

The House’s line of questioning in its hearings veers at countering findings at the Senate, defending the Duterte government’s deals with Pharmally.

Below is Rappler’s full statement:

“May nagkasakit po ba o namatay?” DIWA Representative Michael Aglipay asked this question at a House hearing on Monday, September 27, 2021, in reference to the face shields for health frontliners whose expiration dates were tampered with by Pharmally before the company supplied them to the government. 

Rappler wrote a story based on that quote, coming as it did from no less than the head of the House committee on good governance and a representative of a party-list organization which “aims to protect workers’ rights and promote workers’ welfare for a just and humane society.”

Aglipay must have realized his blunder later, but instead of acknowledging it, he blamed Rappler reporter Rambo Talabong for publishing his quote. He named and shamed Rambo in a committee hearing then removed him from the Viber channel for journalists covering the House committee on good governance.

This is bullying.

Representative Aglipay faulted Rappler for not including in our story a quote from the health secretary that face shields had a shelf life of 36 months. But it is a fact that when Pharmally tampered with the expiration dates, it was past that 36-month shelf life, according to Pharmally’s own warehouse staff. This detail is therefore a non-issue that serves to muddle, not clarify, matters for readers glued to this scandal.

Rappler condemns in the strongest terms Representative Aglipay’s act of removing Rappler from a media coordination channel that is every journalist’s right to access – especially at this time when the public has the right to know more about the Pharmally deal that has cost billions in taxpayers’ money.

– Rappler.com

Must Read

Bakit ako pumalag kay Congressman Michael Aglipay

Bakit ako pumalag kay Congressman Michael Aglipay

Read the other stories from the September 27, 2021, House committee on good government and public accountability hearing: 

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!