Provide your email for confirmation

Tell us a bit about yourself

country *
province *

why we ask about location

Please provide your email address

Login

To share your thoughts

Don't have an account?

Login with email

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue signing in. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Sign up

Ready to get started

Already have an account?

Sign up with email

By signing up you agree to Rappler’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue registering. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Join Rappler+

How often would you like to pay?

Monthly Subscription

Your payment was interrupted

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

Your payment didn’t go through

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

Napoles appeals to anti-graft court: Grant me bail

MANILA, Philippines – Businesswoman Janet Lim Napoles has urged the anti-graft court Sandiganbayan to let her post bail in a P172-million* ($3.65-million) plunder case tagged as the biggest corruption scandal in recent Philippine history.

In a 26-page motion for reconsideration, Napoles said prosecutors failed to present enough evidence against her.

She said prosecutors, in particular, failed to prove a conspiracy between her and public officials such as Senate Minority Leader Juan Ponce Enrile.

The case involves the priority development assistance fund (PDAF) or pork barrel scam allegedy masterminded by Napoles. (READ: Looking at plunder in the PDAF cases)

Napoles told the Sandiganbayan through her lawyer, Romeo Villarta III: “With all due respect, there was no evidence, whether direct or indirect, that Senator Enrile agreed with any of the other accused with respect to the commission of the crime of plunder. Without an overt criminal act that may be ascribed against Enrile…the alleged conspiracy is certainly wanting.”

Evidence ‘mere conjectures’

She added: “(T)he evidence presented by the prosecution to prove the alleged conspiracy are mere conjectures, suppositions, and assumptions which do not have any evidentiary value. Conspiracy cannot be established by mere conjectures but by positive and conclusive evidence.”

This comes after the Sandiganbayan Third Division, in a resolution dated October 16, denied Napoles’ petition to post bail. 

The anti-graft court also said the prosecution has presented enough evidence to support the plunder charge against Napoles.

In her motion for reconsideration, Napoles added that her signature was not on any of the documents presented by the prosecution.

“To avoid facing charges, the whistleblowers conveniently devised fictitious orders coming from accused Napoles, a very strategic escape…for them to be simply cleared of any charges for their crimes,” Napoles said. 

She also said the whistleblowers themselves, not her, profited from the scam linked to her name. – Rappler.com

*$1 = P47.14