Provide your email for confirmation

Tell us a bit about yourself

country *

Please provide your email address

welcome to Rappler


To share your thoughts

Don't have an account?

Login with email

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue signing in. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Sign up

Ready to get started

Already have an account?

Sign up with email

By signing up you agree to Rappler’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue registering. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Join Rappler+

How often would you like to pay?

Annual Subscription

Monthly Subscription

Your payment was interrupted

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

Your payment didn’t go through

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

welcome to Rappler+

Plunder, bribery charges vs 5 more lawmakers in pork barrel mess

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – The Office of the Ombudsman rejected on Monday, January 12, motions for reconsideration filed by 5 lawmakers against findings of probable cause over their alleged involvement in scams involving the pork barrel.

The decision makes way for plunder charges to be filed later this week or next week before the Sandiganbayan against former Masbate Representative Rizalina Seachon-Lanete and former APEC party list representative Edgar Valdez. (READ: More lawmakers to be charged over PDAF scam)

Three other representatives will face malversation or bribery charges:

The Ombudsman approved the orders on December 29, 2014 to affirm the finding of probable cause to indict the lawmakers. 

This is the second batch of cases the Ombudsman is set to file before the anti-graft court in relation to Napoles' multi-million-peso Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) diversion scheme. (READ: Napoles, 3 senators indicted for plunder)

The total amount of PDAF involved in the 5 cases involving former representatives totals around P339 million. 

Lanete allegedly allowed up to P112.29 million worth of her PDAF to fund ghost projects that could have gone to farmer-beneficiaries. These projects were hosted on paper by dummy non-profit foundations allegedly controlled by Napoles.

Napoles allegedly paid off the then congresswoman. State witnesses Benhur Luy, Marina Sula, and Merlina Suñas – former aides of Napoles – claimed the money was either received by the congresswoman's aide Sumalpong or deposited to her personal bank account in Metrobank Fairview branch.

Valdez is accused of misusing up pork barrel funds amounting to P95 million while Dangwa, Plaza, and Jaraula are accused of allegedly misusing pork barrel funds amounting to P54 million, P27.5 million, and P50.5 million respectively. 



What about next batch? 

Although this is the second set of PDAF cases be filed before the Sandiganbayan, the individuals who are set to be charged are still part of the first batch of plunder complaints that the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) filed before the Ombudsman in September 2013.

The Ombudsman has yet to file charges before the court against the individuals named in the second batch of NBI complaints over the PDAF scam. 

Asked to respond to long-standing accusations that the Ombudsman is targeting members of the opposition, Assistant Ombudsman Asryman Rafanan said the anti-corruption body is just going by the order of how the NBI filed its cases.  

"It just so happened that the first batch of cases were the first ones resolved by the office and if the next in line would be the second batch of cases filed with the office, (then we will file them)," Rafanan said. 

The second batch of plunder complaints include former Bureau of Customs chief Rosanno Rufino "Ruffy" Biazon, a former congressman of Muntinlupa and a 2010 defeated senatorial candidate of the Liberal Party.

Department of Justice Undersecretary Jose Justiniano said authorities are prioritizing the cases based on the amount of money involved.

"The law says we should give priority to cases involving high-profile officials and those involving huge sums of money. As far as I can recall, the amount involved in the second batch are much lesser than the amount involved in the 2nd batch," Justiniano said. – with a report from Angela Casauay/