Provide your email for confirmation

Tell us a bit about yourself

country *
province *

why we ask about location

Please provide your email address

Login

To share your thoughts

Don't have an account?

Login with email

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue signing in. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Sign up

Ready to get started

Already have an account?

Sign up with email

By signing up you agree to Rappler’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue registering. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Join Rappler+

How often would you like to pay?

Monthly Subscription

Your payment was interrupted

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

Your payment didn’t go through

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

Psychologists: 'Misleading' to say Sereno failed psych evaluation

MANILA, Philippines – The Psychological Association of the Philippines (PAP) on Friday, March 2, said it was "misleading" to say that Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno had failed a psychological evaluation.

This was among the points that the PAP raised in its official statement on the "ethical and valid use of psychological assessments," which it issued in light of the recent hearings at the House justice committee on the impeachment complaint against Sereno.

What PAP's statement says: One of the points raised by the group is that statements saying Sereno "failed" the psychological evaluation "are misleading, as no one 'passes' or 'fails' a psychological assessment."

"Instead, a psychologist recommends a person to a position after the assessment indicates that he/she possesses the characteristics that fit the demands of the given position," PAP noted.

The group also clarified that:

The PAP maintained that in issuing the statement, they are neither supporting nor opposing any position regarding the issues involving Sereno. Instead, they only seek to "clarify the function of psychological assessments and the diagnosis of psychological conditions."

The context: On Tuesday, February 27, clinical psychologist Geraldine Tria stated categorically before House lawmakers that she would not have recommended Sereno for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court "based on the findings" and her assessment of Sereno's personality.

Tria based her evaluation and conclusion on 2012 and 2014 Manila Times articles, as well as the House deliberations, and had never interviewed or even interacted with Sereno.

Why it matters: The PAP said in its statement that its members "reject recent narratives that directly or indirectly use psychological assessments to stigmatize those with mental or psychological conditions."

"We condemn the unethical practice of using confidential psychological information for purposes of discrediting or damaging a person's character. Even if psychological test results become public documents, this does not grant permission for anybody to use it for any purpose other than its original intent," the group added.

For a full discussion on the issue, read Rappler's in-depth report on the use of Sereno's psychological report during the House impeachment hearings. – Rappler.com