Pharmally

LIVE UPDATES: Senate, House hearings on pandemic deals and Pharmally

DEVELOPING / UPDATED
LIVE UPDATES: Senate, House hearings on pandemic deals and Pharmally

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

The Senate and House of Representatives are investigating the Philippine government’s questionable deals during the COVID-19 pandemic, putting President Rodrigo Duterte on the defensive as the country prepares to elect his successor in May 2022.

At the center of the controversy is the two-year-old firm Pharmally, which bagged over P8 billion ($159.62 million) worth of COVID-19 contracts.

Pharmally, which has links to Duterte’s former economic adviser Michael Yang, won these deals even if it lacked the track record and credibility to engage in big-ticket government procurement. 

Bookmark and refresh this page to watch livestreams, read news articles, and follow other updates on the Pharmally hearings at the Senate and the House of Representatives. – Rappler.com

LATEST UPDATES

LIVE: Senate hearing on gov’t pandemic deals with Pharmally | Tuesday, October 5

LIVE UPDATES: Senate, House hearings on pandemic deals and Pharmally

LIVE: House hearing on gov’t pandemic deals with Pharmally | Monday, October 4

Misplaced anger? Marcoleta chides procurement board for ‘reversing’ Bayanihan 1

Aika Rey

House Deputy Speaker Rodante Marcoleta was fuming during the latest hearing into government’s COVID-19 purchases on Monday, September 27, slamming the Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB) over issuances that confused agencies when procuring supplies.

He zeroed in on a phrase in the GPPB’s issuances that had been cited by the Commission Audit and the Senate in going after Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management on problematic pandemic contracts.

Read the full story here.

Aglipay restricts access of Rappler reporter after story on Pharmally face shields

House committee on good government and public accountability chairman Michael Aglipay unceremoniously removed Rappler journalist Rambo Talabong from a Viber group with reporters on Monday, September 27. 

Aglipay kicked out Talabong after the journalist wrote a story on the DIWA representative’s latest defense of the Duterte administration.

Rappler condemns in the strongest terms Aglipay’s act of removing Rappler from a media coordination channel that is every journalist’s right to access.

Read the full story and our statement here.

Villanueva: What happened to P14-B undelivered pandemic contracts?

Sofia Tomacruz

Citing findings from a report by the Commission on Audit (COA) to the House of Representatives, Deputy Speaker Eddie Villanueva said on Monday, September 27, that about P14.4 billion worth of supplies from pandemic contracts already awarded have yet to be delivered to the government. 

Ano po ang kondisyon ngayon ng P14 billion na iyon? Nasaan po iyon? At bakit hindi nagamit? (What’s the condition of that P14 billion now? Where is that? And why hasn’t it been used yet)” Villanueva asked. 

Villanueva said he wanted to ask questions to show that “hindi moro-moro ang hearing dito sa House of Representatives (The hearing in the House of Representatives is not scripted).” The House has so far mouthed the line of the Duterte government in countering the Senate’s probe.

Read the full story here.

DIWA party-list rep Aglipay: If face shields were expired, did anyone die?

Rambo Talabong

After a stunning revelation at the Senate that face shields obtained by the government from Pharmally could have had their expiration dates changed, the House again came to the defense of the Duterte administration.

During the continuation of the House good government and public accountability panel’s probe on Monday, September 27, chairman DIWA Representative Michael Aglipay asked if the allegedly expired face shields had killed frontliners who used them.

May nagkasakit po ba o namatay (Did anyone get sick or die)?” Aglipay asked the Department of Health.

Read the full story here.

Rappler Recap: Pharmally admits it swindled the government

LIVE UPDATES: Senate, House hearings on pandemic deals and Pharmally

Pharmally official confirms they changed the sticker on face shields for frontliners

Pharmally official Krizle Grace Mago confirms they really changed the sticker on the face shields, removing the production date of 2020 to show the production date of 2021. “It’s a supply issue,” said Mago.

Changing the sticker of production date would mean prolonging the shelf life beyond its original expiry date. The CDC does not recommend using PPE beyond manufacturer-designated shelf life. But if pressed to do so, they should be inspected thoroughly.

Mago names Mohit Dargani, the company’s corporate secretary and treasurer, as the one who ordered to change the certification stickers of face shields for frontliners.

PS-DBM contradicts self: It required financial proof from suppliers even under Bayanihan law

Lian Buan

As implicated officials continue to take cover under the exemptions of the Bayanihan law, Senator Richard Gordon showed on Tuesday, September 21, an internal document of the  Procurement Service-Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM) that showed they required suppliers to present financial proof.

If Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corporation, the pandemic procurements’ biggest winner, was required to show its NFCC, it would have never qualified for the contracts because in 2020 at the start of the pandemic, it had only P625,000 in paid-up capital with no track record.

“Ito ba ang sinasabing supplier na kayang-kaya magdeliver? Eh panay short ang delivery, panay delayed, puro extension. Meron nang liquidated damages charged. Eh hindi naman siguro mapapatunay na talagang may kapasidad silang magdeliver kapag ganiyan,” said Senator Imee Marcos.

Read the full story here.