4 options for the Philippines’ coronavirus lockdown

Sofia Tomacruz
4 options for the Philippines’ coronavirus lockdown


(UPDATED) It's a choice between a deadly increase in coronavirus cases and needing to restart the economy whose downtime has left thousands jobless and hungry

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – At 11:59 pm Thursday, April 30, millions of residents of Luzon, the Philippines’ largest island group, are supposed to see the lifting of a sudden lockdown put in place to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus.

President Rodrigo Duterte had implemented an extension of the lockdown, which was supposed to end two weeks earlier on April 12. 

At stake is the risk of experiencing a deadly increase in coronavirus cases and the need to restart the economy whose downtime has left thousands jobless and hungry.

While set to end on April 30, the lifting of the Luzon-wide lockdown by the end of the month is not yet final. 

With a little over a week to go before the lockdown ends, Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque on Monday, April 20, said the public can expect the President to make a decision sometime this week.  

Roque said among experts being tapped to discuss possible quarantine measures after April 30 are former health secretaries Jaime Galvez Tan, Esperanza Cabral, and Janette Garin.

Aside from them, infectious disease experts Ana Lisa Ong Lim and  Marissa Alejandria; health policy and public health experts Katherine Ann Reyes and Susan Mercado, internal medicine expert Anthony Leachon; as well as hazards expert and University of the Philippines professor Alfredo Mahar Lagmay were tapped to advice government officials on next steps to take. 


Roque said among main options being considered are an extension of the enhanced community quarantine in Luzon or a modified lockdown to be implemented at the provincial, municipal, and barangay levels. 

CHECKPOINT. Policemen conduct quarantine checks on commuters in public transportation vehicles at the Cavitex exit in Parañaque City on March 16, 2020. Photo by Dante Diosina Jr/Rappler

Public health experts have stressed, however, that there is no ideal timeline for a lockdown. 

What countries usually look for are a sustained record  of “no new cases” or a decline in new cases at a level when it can start to ease restrictions.

How close are we to seeing that happen? The answer is still hazy as data on how many people have been tested – and what the true picture of the disease looks like in the Philippines at present – remains limited.  

Like most countries on lockdown, the Philippines faces a balancing act: calibrating its response to ensure that the health system does not buckle from a surge in coronavirus cases, and making sure that those who are most adversely affected by draconian measures are able to survive a prolonged quarantine.  

There are fears, too, that risks from social distancing measures – like upended routines, growing hunger, and lost jobs – are quickly taking their toll on the public, while benefits from the lockdown have not been in place long enough to arrest the spread of infection. 

Here are at least 4 known options that officials are considering in relation to the Luzon lockdown, each with its own risks and benefits. They are as follows:

  • Lockdown continues after April 30
  • Modified quarantine measures are implemented after April 30
  • Lockdown measures are extended throughout the Visayas and Mindanao
  • Lockdown is lifted after April 30

FRONT LINES. The National Kidney and Transplant Institute in Quezon City sets up a triage facility at the hospital's compound to evaluate and categorize patients on March 29, 2020. File photo by Angie de Silva/Rappler

But first, how is the government assessing the lockdown? 

The government’s coronavirus task force adopted the following parameters proposed by its sub-technical working group on data analytics in deciding the fate of the lockdown: 

  • Trends in the COVID-19 epidemiological curve, which include, among others, the doubling time, acceleration, or deceleration of new cases.
  • Capacity of the health care system, which includes, among others:
    • Number and availability of quarantine, isolation, and treatment facilities (LIST: National quarantine centers)
    • Capability to mount contact tracing (The health department has identified some 259 people from its offices and another 16,221 primary care personnel). 
    • Availability of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for frontliners, and the testing capacity of the country (Local production of some 10,000 PPEs daily will start on April 13, while “massive testing” of suspected coronavirus patients is to start mid-April).
  • Social factors
  • Economic factors
  • Security factors 

A sub-technical working group led by the Department of Health, with the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Department of Science and Technology; and technical experts from the academe, health, economic, and security sectors have convened to assess the lockdown and provide recommendations.   

EMPTY. The Rizal Park in Manila is temporarily closed to visitors during the month-long enhanced community quarantine in Luzon. Photo by Inoue Jaena/Rappler

Option 1: Lockdown continues past April 30
The President earlier chose to extend the lockdown in Luzon to April 30. 

This option of another extension is on the table again as a possible scenario, Roque said. 

In this case, the status quo remains: strict home quarantine will continue, while land, sea, and air travel restrictions will stay in place.

The movement of people will likewise remain limited to purchasing essential goods and reporting to work deemed essential by the government.

Health experts said earlier projected cases could reach anywhere between 26,000 and 75,000.  If this does happen, choosing this option avoids crippling the Philippines’ already weak health system. 

A recent study from the University of the Philippines (UP) COVID-19 Pandemic Response Team also found this option would flatten the curve the most.

But if the government decides to extend the lockdown again, it must be able to ensure the need for food and financial assistance can be delivered to those most affected by quarantine measures. 

Hundreds of Filipinos have already pleaded for the government’s help, saying they no longer have food or the means to last until the lifting of the lockdown period.

While the Department of Social Welfare and Development started to deliver aid to residents, relief is either lacking or can’t come quickly enough due to red tape and logistical gaps.

TRANSIT. Policemen at the Susana Heights-SLEX checkpoint check the body temperature and identification cards of commuters entering Metro Manila on March 16, 2020. Photo by Martin San Diego/Rappler

Option 2: Modified quarantine measures are implemented after April 30

This option is favored by some lawmakers and members of the business community to cushion the economic impact of an enhanced community quarantine. Here, a calibrated lockdown will be implemented where some physical distancing measures will remain in place, but certain segments of the economy will be able to resume activity. 

The National Economic and Development Authority earlier projected possible job losses to reach 2.5 million due to quarantine measures resulting from the outbreak. The Philippine Institute of Development Studies also earlier estimated the country was losing some P150 billion per week under enhanced community quarantine measures. 

Roque said Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III suggested this could be implemented based on the number of cases per area, where communities with limited number of cases may see eased restrictions after April 30. 

Under a modified lockdown, individuals who are considered “high-risk” like senior citizens and those with co-morbidities will also be made to stay home. 

Roque said the proposal of Presidential Adviser for Entrepreneurship Joey Concepcion was also being considered. 

Concepcion had earlier proposed to shift to selective quarantine at the barangay level instead of the entire Luzon after a meeting with 60 business leaders and 6 government officials.

Under this option, local government units and their respective mayors will implement lockdown measures, based on guidelines from the government’s coronavirus task force. 

The checkpoint system will also be replaced with barangay-level quarantines for areas with confirmed cases.  

The option sees all manufacturing, construction, and agricultural activities operating again, based on demand. Aside from this, government is to ensure the unhampered flow of all cargo from “essential manufacturing” and “essential infrastructure” activities, as well as agriculture activities. 

“All sectors still to be encouraged to work from home but permit physical work in the largest employment groups such as construction, non-food manufacturing, energy infrastructure, and government,” Concepcion said in a letter to the sub-group on “forward-planning” headed by NEDA. 

Meanwhile, mass gatherings will remain banned, and schools and malls will remain closed. High-risk individuals and students will also remain in their homes.  

PHYSICAL DISTANCING. A mall in Makati City is empty on March 14, 2020, hours before the lockdown takes effect in Metro Manila. File photo by Alecs Ongcal/Rappler

In Concepcion’s proposal, public transportation may be allowed to operate at a “reduced level” to ferry workers. Private vehicles, bicycles, and certain types of vehicles consistent with physical distancing would be allowed.

Trave restrictions for flights to and from Luzon will also remain in place.

A modified lockdown, the UP study said, could still lead to a peak in cases, but one that is lower if no physical distancing measures were in place. 

In an interview with Rappler, former DOH secretary Manuel Dayrit said that with a calibrated lockdown, the government must see to it that this goes hand in hand with measures to isolate patients under investigation.

“It is too late if we isolated a person only after s/he was confirmed to be positive,” he said. 

Dayrit added that masks for everyone should likewise be the order of the day. 

Former health secretary Dr Jaime Galvez Tan told Rappler that such a option may also be feasible for areas with no confirmed cases. 

But before imposing a modified lockdown, government, Tan said, should ensure hospital organization networks are clear, a system for the management of suspected coronavirus cases is in place, supply of masks can be assured, and widespread testing can be done.  

BEFORE QUARANTINE. Passengers bound for Bohol rush to the Cebu Port on March 14, 2020, to beat the 5-day community quarantine in Bohol province set to start on March 15. File photo by Gelo Litonjua/Rappler

Option 3: Lockdown measures are extended throughout the Visayas and Mindanao

The strict quarantine measures that we now see in Luzon will become the new reality for residents in the Visayas and Mindanao. 

While there are already several areas in the Visayas and Mindanao that declared their own lockdowns, strict physical distancing measures in Luzon will extend to the rest of the country. 

So far, this is not a likely option. According to Dr Edsel Salvana – an infectious disease expert part of the advisory group to the IATF – there is not enough data to support this decision. 

“Most cases are still in NCR. More localized measures may suffice,” he said. 

At least 177 cases have been reported in 9 provinces and 5 independent cities in the Visayas, while 151 cases have been reported in 11 provinces and 5 independent cities in Mindanao as of Sunday, April 19. 

QUIET. Metro Manila's main thoroughfares are empty due to the enhanced community quarantine imposed over Luzon which began on March 17. Photo by Martin San Diego/Rappler

Option 4: Lockdown is lifted after April 30

This is a most unlikely scenario as risks that come with lifting quarantine measures and returning to daily routines are high.

“I don’t think the lock down will be lifted totally. There will probably be compulsory lockdown, particularly for vulnerable persons and older age groups,” Dayrit said, describing a more likely outcome. 

The option was favored by neither business groups nor health experts. 


Whether the government decides to extend, modify, or lift the lockdown, Dayrit said that if they are to protect themselves and those around them, Filipinos must understand that they can be possible carriers of the coronavirus. 

Failing to do so, he said, can expose others to the risk of developing severe conditions from the disease and even death. 

“If people can accept this reality, not be in denial, and religiously take the proper steps to protect himself/herself, the family, and close everyday contacts, that’s all one can do,” Dayrit said. 

The buck, however, will stop with President Rodrigo Duterte who will ultimately decide on whether or not to approve, modify, or reject recommendations made by the government’s coronavirus task force and its advisers. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.


Sofia Tomacruz

Sofia Tomacruz covers defense and foreign affairs. Follow her on Twitter via @sofiatomacruz.