Part 1: Did Aquino deliver on his promises?

Camille Elemia

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Part 1: Did Aquino deliver on his promises?
Rappler looks at Aquino's 'Social Contract with the Filipino People' to determine how he fared during his term


  • On corruption, Aquino walked the talk. In 2012, he sought the impeachment of former chief justice Renato Corona. Opposition Senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Ramon “Bong” Revilla, and Jinggoy Estada are also in jail for alleged misuse of their PDAF. But convictions are expected to take long.
  • While it is under Aquino that the Philippines became known as the “next Tiger economy”, the challenge of inclusive growth remains.
  • The administration’s flagship anti-poverty program, the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program, has now included 4.4 million household-beneficiaries. But some recipients say little has changed in their lives. 


MANILA, Philippines – From a reluctant presidential candidate to someone at the helm of the country for 5 years – simply put, that’s what President Benigno Aquino III has been. With only a year left in Malacanang, has he fulfilled his promises from his 2010 campaign?

Aquino’s “Social Contract with the Filipino People” was the platform of his campaign. The document includes a 16-point agenda aimed at creating social and structural change. Rappler reviewed this document to determine how he has fared as president. 

We classified these 16 points into 7 groups: Corruption, Economy, Poverty, Justice, Overseas Filipino Workers, Peace and Order, and Environment.



From a president who tolerates corruption to a president who is the nation’s first and most determined fighter of corruption.

‘Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap’

This has been the battle cry of Aquino since the 2010 campaign. He publicly denounced the preceding administration and even sought the imprisonment of former president Gloria Arroyo. In all his State of the Nation Addresses (SONAs), Aquino consistently blamed corruption during the Arroyo administration for present problems. To this day, the courts, however, have failed to convict Arroyo for plunder.

Aquino walked the talk. In 2012, he sought the impeachment of former chief justice Renato Corona, one of the so-called midnight appointees of Arroyo. It was a brilliant move, with foresight. After all, many issues involving the administration’s policies went through the Supreme Court for debate after the trial.

Some may call it ironic but the Aquino administration, whose supposed number one enemy was corruption, was challenged with corruption issues as well, as some allies were linked to the misuse of their own multi-million Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF).

The alleged pork barrel queen Janet Lim Napoles is now in prison. Opposition Senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Ramon “Bong” Revilla, and Jinggoy Estada are also in jail for alleged misuse of their funds coursed through non-existent or bogus non-governmental organizations of Napoles. All of them, however, have yet to be convicted. (READ: INFOGRAPHIC: How NGOs get their hands on the pork barrel

Most administration senators linked to the pork barrel scam, however, remain untouched to date. Only former Customs chief Ruffy Biazon has been charged with malversation.

It wasn’t long after when the administration’s Development Acceleration Program backfired. While they say DAP is different from PDAF, critics have called it the President’s “pork barrel.”

Even the administration’s transparency on the national budget failed to stop criticism. The Department of Budget and Management posted on its website the projects funded by DAP. But it was incomplete, as there are unspecified projects or those identified only as “various infrastructure projects” and “various (women) empowerment programs.” What exactly were these projects and how much was spent for each is still unclear. (READ: Where did DAP funds go?

Then there’s the wide-scale corruption at the Bureau of Corrections. Nothing new. But what is appalling is the extent of the freedom enjoyed by wealthy criminals in jail while carrying out their sentences. A surprise raid revealed that many high-profile inmates enjoy luxuries inside their prison cells (READ: IN PHOTOS: Drug lords, murderers, and high living in Bilibid). It’s been a long-standing issue in the agency. Time and again, officials are relieved, new heads are appointed, investigations are conducted but the problem persists.

From Presidential appointees chosen mainly out of political accommodation to discerning selection based on integrity, competence and performance in serving the public good.

Aquino questioned the appointees of Arroyo, especially those midnight appointments done during the ban, but he himself had questionable appointments as well. The term KKK or “Kaibigan (Friend), Kaklase (Classmate), Kabarilan (Shooting buddies)” was coined during the start of his term, following his appointment of friends to government posts.

But among all of his numerous friends in office, what struck the public the most was Aquino’s loyalty to Purisima. The two go a long way back, with Purisima being Aquino’s security aide during former president Corazon Aquino’s administration. 

SACKED. File photo of ex-PNP chief Alan Purisima. Photo by Mark Cristino/Rappler

Aside from the multi-million-peso corruption allegations against him, Purisima was questioned for his involvement in the Mamasapano incident while under suspension as PNP Chief. Despite calls for him to do so, Aquino refused to sack his long-time ally. It took the Office of the Ombudsman to act on it

The President has exhibited political will in the cases of Arroyo, Corona, and the highly controversial Reproductive Health and Sin Tax Reform laws. He has to flex his muscles some more in the case of the Freedom of Information bill, which continues to languish in the administration-controlled Congress.  

(READ: Corruption at LTO, LTFRB: Unfit drivers, vehicles on the road and Part 2: Corruption at the LTO)



The Aquino administration prides itself in its economic gains. 

The Asian Development Bank sees a continued “robust expansion” in the country. Local and foreign analysts also expect a gross domestic product (GDP) of 6.4% during the Aquino administration, higher than the 4.8% average during the 9-year Arroyo term.

Data from the World Economic Forum in 2013 also showed the Philippines as being the “most improved country” overall, rising to 52nd place. In 2010, the country ranked only 85th. The improvement is the highest in the ASEAN region since 2010.  

Rankings of Competitiveness Pillars in the Philippines

  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014

Change since 2010

Global Competitive Index 85 75 65 59 52 +33
1.  Institutions 125 117 94 79 67 +58
2.  Infrastrcuture 104 105 98 96 91 +13
3.  Macroeconomic environment 68 54 36 40 26 +42
4.  Health & primary education 90 92 98 96 92 -2
5.  Higher education & training 73 71 64 67 64 +9
6.  Goods market efficiency 97 88 86 82 70 +27
7.  Labor market efficiency 111 113 103 100 91 +20
8.  Financial market dev’t 75 71 58 48 49 +26
9.  Technological readiness 95 83 79 77 69 +26
10. Market size 37 36 35 33 35 +2
11. Business sophistication 60 57 49 49 46 +14
12. Innovation 111 108 94 69 52 +5

Source: World Economic Forum The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015


WEF data specifically show the improvement of the Philippines in terms of macroeconomic environment, business sophistication, institutions, innovation, and infrastructure.

Since the start of the Aquino administration, the Philippines has received at least 9 credit rating and outlook upgrades from international agencies, the latest of which is from the Tokyo-based Japan Credit Rating Agency Ltd (JCR) in July. It tells investors it is safe to do business in the country, and encourages them to put huge capital here. 

While it is under Aquino that the Philippines became known as the “next Tiger economy”, there is still the challenge of inclusive growth. Numbers, they say, do not lie. People who consistently pin their hopes on politicians for better lives see their lives unchanged. 

For an economy to prosper, there needs to be an efficient public transport system. Commuting using our train system has become a nightmare. Thousands of passengers line up under the heat and rain, only to stand in packed coaches. After a technical glitch, unfortunate passengers end up walking on train tracks, or end up injured. (READ: End Metro Manila traffic, fund sustainable transport) 

DERAILED. An MRT3 train gets derailed at the Taft Station in Pasay City on August 13, 2014. Photo by Jose Del/Rappler

Operating at the level of about 500,000 passengers per day on a capacity of only 350,000, the Metro Rail Transit (MRT-3) trains continue to be worn down from excessive burden. 

It didn’t help, either, that amid all the failures of the MRT, the transportation department approved the fare hike and Malacañang issued “insensitive” remarks urging commuters to use other modes of public transportation. (READ: Commuters to Coloma: Why not take the bus yourself?) 

MRT3 passengers are at the receiving end. They will have to wait a little bit longer, as delivery of new coaches is delayed. The deliveries are set to begin in January 2016, instead of late 2015.


While the Aquino administration celebrates economic development under its term, many Filipinos have yet to feel the gains.

The administration’s flagship anti-poverty program, the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program, has now included 4.4 million household-beneficiaries. But some recipients say little has changed in their lives. At best, whatever gains have been made must be continued and further improved on.

Conclusion: Part 2: Did Aquino deliver on his promises?


Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI
Face, Person, Human


Camille Elemia

Camille Elemia is a former multimedia reporter for Rappler. She covered media and disinformation, the Senate, the Office of the President, and politics.