Login
To share your thoughts
Don't have an account?
Check your inbox
We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue signing in. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.
Didn't get a link?
Sign up
Ready to get started
Already have an account?
Check your inbox
We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue registering. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.
Didn't get a link?
Join Rappler+
How often would you like to pay?
Monthly Subscription
Your payment was interrupted
Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress
Your payment didn’t go through
Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress
The Philippine Commission on Human Rights (CHR) will soon release an exhaustive report on companies it has found to be morally liable for the ill-effects of climate change.
A first case of its kind in the world to frame climate justice as a human rights issue, the CHR worked within the limited parameters of trying to impose exact accountability from global companies and even the governments that enable them.
The CHR report would not be legally binding on anyone, but the CHR hopes it can give birth to a string of new cases all over the world.
There are many difficulties in attaining climate justice within the existing frameworks – just some of them involving the doctrine of political issue, and a global consensus that many of our economies still rely on fossil fuel.
How do we use domestic and international law mechanisms to save the world?
Justice reporter Lian Buan spoke with CHR Commissioner Roberto Cadiz for this episode. Cadiz headed the CHR's inquiry panel which held hearings in the Philippines and abroad to come up with a report that found evidence of some companies and governments blocking efforts to transition to clean energy.
Listen to past episodes:
If you have tips and suggestions for episodes, email the host at lian.buan@rappler.com. – Rappler.com