Rule of law report pinpoints room for progress in Asia

Agence France-Presse
East Asia scores well when it comes to keeping a lid on crime, but it still has work to do on other key factors that constitute the rule of law; PH low on protection of fundamental rights

WASHINGTON DC, United States – East Asia scores well when it comes to keeping a lid on crime, but it still has work to do on other key factors that constitute the rule of law, a study published Wednesday, November 28, suggests.

The non-profit World Justice Project’s third annual Rule of Law Index takes stock of the development of the core legal concept in 97 countries and jurisdictions, based on interviews with 97,000 citizens and 2,500 experts.

It quantifies such factors as limited government powers, absence of corruption, order and security, fundamental rights, open government, regulatory enforcement, civil justice and criminal justice.

Worldwide, the Nordic nations — Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden — as well as the Netherlands scored best across all nine factors, according to the 228-page report.

In terms of order and security, Singapore and Hong Kong scored the highest of all countries, with regional neighbors Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam and South Korea also placing among the top 30. China was at 32.

But with the exception of Japan and Hong Kong, East Asian nations lagged in other areas.

China’s “relatively effective” criminal justice system was compromised by political meddling and due-process violations, while its strict limits on freedom of speech and assembly put it near the bottom for fundamental rights.

Indonesia ranked last in East Asia in terms of corruption, and police abuses and harsh prison conditions were also deemed to be significant problems, according to the report.

Fundamental rights were a concern in Malaysia and Singapore, while Thailand lagged in terms of civil justice due to delays in processing cases and difficulties in enforcing court rulings.

PH: Low on fundamental rights

In the case of the Philippines, the report said the country has “reasonably effective checks on government power” among lower-middle income countries, but ranks low on protection of fundamental rights.

“The country also has problems with respect to protection of fundamental rights (ranking 59th overall), particularly in regard to violations against the right to life and security of the person, police abuses,due process violations, and harsh conditions at correctional facilities,” the report said.

“The civil court system scores poorly (ranking 84th globally) due to deficient enforcement mechanisms, corruption among judges and law enforcement officers, and the lengthy duration of cases,” it added.

The country also ranks high in effective regulatory enforcement among lower-middle income nations, placing fifth in the said measure.

Elsewhere, South Asia as a region came out as “the weakest performer overall in most dimensions of the rule of law,” despite efforts in many countries to beef up governance, the report said.

India’s independent judiciary, free-speech protections and relatively open government were countered by corruption and serious security concerns, while Pakistan was hampered by a low level of government accountability, corruption, a weak justice system and a poor security situation.

In its introduction the report — funded by major US charitable foundations and global corporations — stressed that no society has ever achieved perfection when it comes to applying the rule of law.

“It’s a work in progress,” Juan Carlos Botero, executive director of the World Justice Project, told AFP in an interview at its offices in Washington prior to the Rule of Law Index’s release.

The United States was found seriously lagging in access to justice for low-income citizens, while Latin America was plagued by security concerns and the Middle East by a lack of respect for fundamental rights.

Botero said the report — featuring more countries this year than were in previous editions — is not so much a global league table as a tool for nations to compare themselves among peers and see what advances can be made.

“Placing the issue in a broader context creates a powerful argument to make improvements,” he said. – Robert MacPherson, Agence France-Presse, with

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.