It’s a No: Scotland rejects independence

Rodneil Quiteles
It’s a No: Scotland rejects independence


(UPDATED) While the United Kingdom survived a potential end to a 3-century-old union, it could soon look very different

EDINBURGH, United Kingdom (4th UPDATE) – Scotland rejected independence on Friday, September 19, in a referendum that left the centuries-old United Kingdom intact but paved the way for a major transfer of powers away from London.

Despite a surge in nationalist support in the final fortnight of the campaign, the “No” secured 55.30% of the vote against 44.70% for the pro-independence “Yes” camp.









Final tally as of 8:15 AM British Standard Time (3:15 pm Manila time), 32 of 32 councils declaring results.

After a campaign that fired up separatist movements around the world, turnout was 84.6%, officials said – the highest ever for an election in Britain.

“No” campaigners across Scotland cheered and hugged as the results came in and British Prime Minister David Cameron said he was “delighted”, adding: “It would have broken my heart to see our United Kingdom come to an end.”

Many “Yes” activists watched dejected and in tears, although First Minister Alex Salmond urged them take heart from the huge numbers – 1.6 million – who backed independence.

“I don’t think any of us, whenever we entered politics, would have thought such a thing to be either credible or possible,” the Scottish National Party (SNP) leader told cheering supporters in Edinburgh.

The result reassured those worried about the economic risks of a break-up.

The pound rose against the dollar and the euro on the currency markets, and the London stock market rallied sharply in opening trade.

The CBI business lobby group said the result would be greeted by a “collective sigh of relief across the business community”.

The president of the European Parliament, Martin Schultz, was the first to react abroad, saying he was “relieved” and adding: “I like a United Kingdom in a united Europe.”

A “Yes” vote would have brought to an abrupt end a union with England stretching back to 1707 and has been closely watched around the world, giving heart to independence supporters from Catalonia in Spain to Quebec in Canada.

British Prime Minister, David Cameron speaks to the press outside number 10 Downing Street in central London England, 19 September 2014. Facundo Arrizabalaga/EPA

But while the UK survived, it could soon look very different.

The British government must now deliver on promises made in the heat of the campaign to give more powers over tax, spending and welfare to the devolved government in Edinburgh.

And in a televised address from Downing Street, Cameron said he would go further and offer all parts of the United Kingdom some form of devolved control over their affairs.

What’s next for Scotland? No independence, more powers

Scotland may have rejected independence but will now be handed new powers by Britain which could amount to effective home rule – though experts warn that agreeing these could be messy. Read more>>

“Just as Scotland will vote separately in the Scottish Parliament on their issues of tax, spending and welfare, so too England, as well as Wales and Northern Ireland, should be able to vote on these issues,” he said.

In what would be a radical shake-up of the constitutional order, he said these new powers would be delivered “at the same pace as the settlement for Scotland”, suggesting legislation would be drawn up as soon as January.

‘Crushing, devastating result’

Some 97% of eligible Scots had registered to vote – a sign of how the historic decision gripped the nation.

Charlotte Darroch, one of many 16- and 17-year-olds who were allowed to vote in a British election for the first time, said the result was “just crushing, quite devastating”.

Scotland's First Minister Alex Salmond delivers his final independence speech to supporters in Perth, Scotland, Britain, 17 September 2014. Andy Rain/EPA

“I genuinely thought the feeling on the ground was different,” said the 16-year-old as she made her way to school in Edinburgh wearing a blue-and-white Scotland flag over her uniform.

But Louise Fleming, 21, who also lives in the Scottish capital, said she was “relieved”.

“It’s been such a divisive referendum, we have seen the outcome, we can’t expect everything to be great tomorrow but the right outcome has occurred,” she said.

There were queues outside polling stations on referendum day and many voters spoke emotionally about the most momentous political choice of their lives.

Crowds later partied through the night in Glasgow and Edinburgh, draped in the Scottish flag and setting off flares.

‘Settled for a generation’


On 18 September 2014, Scotland’s 4 million voters headed to the polls and answered this question: “Should Scotland Be An Independent Country?”

The answer was No.

Full coverage on

Scotland’s largest city Glasgow was among some big wins for the “Yes” campaign, but the margin was not enough to mitigate a flood of “No” votes across Scotland.

The indication was that better-off and rural areas had voted “No” while urban centers and poorer parts voted “Yes”.

“Clearly the ‘No’ side has won,” said polling expert John Curtice, a professor of politics at Strathclyde University.

The outcome is good news for Cameron, who many suggested could not have survived if Scotland had voted to break away.

He said the referendum had produced a “clear result”, adding: “Now the debate has been settled for a generation… there can be no disputes, no re-runs.”

However, Salmond left the door open to a vote in the future, saying that Scots had voted “at this stage” to stay but had shown “substantial” support for going it alone.

Bestselling author and pro-union supporter J.K. Rowling, who is English but lives in Scotland, said Scots should be “proud”, whatever their differences.

“Been up all night watching Scotland make history. A huge turnout, a peaceful democratic process: we should be proud.” –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.