Hong Kong Security Law

Hong Kong man sentenced to 9 years in prison in first national security case

Reuters

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Hong Kong man sentenced to 9 years in prison in first national security case

SENTENCED. Police stand guard outside the High Court during court hearing of Tong Ying-kit, the first person charged under a new national security law, in Hong Kong, on July 30, 2021.

Tyrone Siu/Reuters

Judges sentence Tong Ying-kit to 6.5 years for inciting secession and 8 years for terrorist activities

The first person convicted under Hong Kong’s national security law was sentenced to nine years for terrorist activities and inciting secession, judges said on Friday, July 30, in a watershed ruling with long-term implications for the city’s judicial landscape.

Former waiter Tong Ying-kit, 24, was accused of driving his motorcycle into three riot police last year while carrying a flag with the protest slogan “Liberate Hong Kong. Revolution of our times.”

Judges Esther Toh, Anthea Pang and Wilson Chan – picked by city leader Carrie Lam to hear national security cases – ruled on Tuesday, July 27, that the slogan was “capable of inciting others to commit secession.”

On Friday, the judges sentenced Tong to 6.5 years for inciting secession and 8 years for terrorist activities. Of these, 2.5 years will run consecutively, resulting in a total term of 9 years.

“We consider that this overall term should sufficiently reflect the Defendant’s culpability in the two offences and the abhorrence of society, at the same time, achieving the deterrent effect required,” they said in a written judgment.

Human rights groups, including Amnesty International, have criticised Tong’s conviction, saying it imposes new limits on free speech, as well as the precedents set by the trial, which they say contrast with Hong Kong’s common law traditions.

Tong was denied bail in line with a provision of the national security law that puts the onus on the defendant to prove they would not be a security threat if released. Tong also did not get a trial by jury because of “a perceived risk of the personal safety of jurors and their family members or that due administration of justice might be impaired.”

The Hong Kong government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have repeatedly said that all the rights and freedoms promised to the former British colony upon its return to Chinese rule in 1997 were intact, but that national security was a red line. All cases have been handled in accordance with the law, both governments have said.

At a pre-sentencing hearing on Thursday, July 29, lawyer Clive Grossman pleaded for lenience, saying any incitement was of a “minor nature” and Tong was a “decent young man” who did something “stupid.”

Tong, who pleaded not guilty to all charges, was also found guilty of terrorist activities, with judges saying his motorcycle was potentially a lethal weapon and his actions “a deliberate challenge mounted against the police.”

An alternative charge of dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm was not considered.

Tong’s trial focused mostly on the meaning of the slogan, which was ubiquitous during Hong Kong’s mass 2019 protests.

The arguments over its interpretation drew on topics such as ancient Chinese history, the US civil rights movement and Malcolm X.

The judges said on Tuesday they were “sure that the Defendant fully understood the Slogan to bear the meaning of Hong Kong Independence.” Tong did not testify during the trial. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!