Doomed AirAsia jet’s climb echoes Air France disaster

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

The Air France flight from Rio to Paris vanished at night during a storm. The aircraft's speed sensors were found to have malfunctioned, and the plane climbed too steeply, causing it to stall.
DISAPPEARED. An official from Indonesia's national search and rescue agency in Medan, North Sumatra points at his computer screen to the position where AirAsia flight QZ8501 went missing off the waters of Indonesia on December 28, 2014. Photo by AFP

JAKARTA, Indonesia – Revelations that AirAsia Flight QZ8501 climbed too fast before stalling and plunging into the sea point to “striking” similarities between the Java Sea accident and the 2009 crash of an Air France jet, analysts said Wednesday, January 21.

Indonesian Transport Minister Ignasius Jonan said the Airbus A320-200 was ascending at a rate of 6,000 feet (1,800 meters) a minute before stalling, as it flew in stormy weather last month from Indonesia’s Surabaya to Singapore. (READ: AirAsia plane climbed at speed ‘beyond normal’ then stalled)

“In the final minutes, the plane climbed at a speed which was beyond normal,” he told reporters Tuesday.

That ascent is about two to three times the normal climb rate for a commercial jetliner, according to experts.

Indonesian divers recovered the plane’s black boxes a week ago, after an arduous search for the jet that crashed on December 28 with 162 people on board. The cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder are now being analyzed, with a preliminary report due next week. (READ: Divers recover AirAsia cockpit voice recorder)

While they stressed the difficulty of drawing conclusions without seeing the full black box data, analysts said the accident had strong echoes of the crash of Air France flight 447 into the Atlantic in 2009, with the loss of 228 lives.

“The similarities are pretty striking,” Daniel Tsang, founder of Hong Kong-based consultancy Aspire Aviation, told AFP.

In that case, the Airbus A330 en route from Rio to Paris vanished at night during a storm. The aircraft’s speed sensors were found to have malfunctioned, and the plane climbed too steeply, causing it to stall.

As with the AirAsia disaster, the accident happened in what is known as the “intertropical convergence zone”, an area around the equator where the north and south trade winds meet, and thunderstorms are common.

RECOVERED. Indonesian national search and rescue agency's (BASARNAS) crew lifts up the wreckage of AirAsia QZ8501 aircraft tail from the Crest Onyx ship, after it was hoisted from the Java Sea during their recovery mission at Panglima Utar Kumai Harbour in Kumai, Central Kalimantan, on January 11, 2015. Photo by Bagus Indahono/EPA

‘Phenomenal’ climb 

The investigation into AF447 found that both technical and human error were to blame. After the speed sensors froze up and failed, the pilots failed to react properly, according to the French aviation authority who said they lacked proper training.

Jonan on Tuesday likened the doomed plane’s ascent to a fighter jet, although experts noted that warplanes can climb considerably faster – 10,000 feet per minute when at altitude.

However, Tom Ballantyne, Sydney-based chief correspondent for Orient Aviation magazine, said the rate of climb of the AirAsia jet was “just phenomenal”, adding: “I’m not sure I’ve heard of anything that dramatic before.”

He said it would be unusual for weather alone to cause such a rapid ascent, but added it was possible if the jet hit “some bizarre unprecedented storm cell”.

“It is possible that the aircraft could have got caught in some sort of updraft that lifted it thousands of feet,” he said.

‘Although there are similarities with Air France, and the weather seems to be a factor, we can’t make any conclusions that this is caused by the weather or icing – it’s too early’

–Gerry Soejatman, aviation analyst

However, while saying the rapid ascent showed that there was “something very wrong”, Gerry Soejatman, a Jakarta-based independent aviation analyst, added it was too early to have a firm read on the cause of the crash.

“Although there are similarities with Air France, and the weather seems to be a factor, we can’t make any conclusions that this is caused by the weather or icing – it’s too early,” he said.

Nevertheless, Tsang said the probe was unfolding as analysts had predicted, with no explosions or loud bangs registered on the cockpit voice recorder, and thus no indication terrorism played a role.

Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Committee, which is probing the crash, said this week they are now focusing on human or aircraft error as probable causes, after analyzing the data from the cockpit recorder. (READ: AirAsia crash probe focuses on human error, plane damage)

A huge international hunt for the crashed plane, involving ships from several countries including the US and China, finally located the wreckage at relatively shallow depth in the Java Sea. (READ: World powers jostle for influence in AirAsia plane hunt)

Indonesian search and rescue teams have so far recovered just 53 bodies, but hopes that more victims will be found were raised last week when a Singapore navy ship located the jet’s main body, with the airline’s motto “Now Everyone Can Fly” painted on the side. (READ: Main body of crashed AirAsia jet located)

However, divers have not succeeded in reaching the fuselage despite several attempts due to bad weather, high waves and strong underwater currents.

All but 7 of the 162 on board the flight were Indonesian. The foreign nationals were from South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Britain and France. –Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!