Crunch time for Merkel to build coalition or face new polls

BERLIN, Germany – German Chancellor Angela Merkel heads back into tense coalition talks Saturday, November 18, in a last-ditch effort to forge a coalition government and avert a political crisis in Europe’s biggest economy.

The veteran leader won a September 24 vote without a clear majority for her conservative CDU/CSU bloc, largely due to the rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), and must now build an unlikely alliance with the pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) and left-leaning Greens.

Their deep policy differences however, especially on immigration and the environment, have hobbled the month-long negotiating marathon, leading the players to miss a Thursday, November 16 deadline and declare they will push on until Sunday evening, November 19.

Until and unless the motley crew of 4 parties, which spans the mainstream political spectrum, strikes a deal, Germany’s government remains in effective limbo with Merkel serving as caretaker chancellor.

If they fail, Germany is headed for likely snap elections, which would leave Merkel increasingly exposed to a rising band of critics within her own ranks and could further boost the anti-Islam AfD.

Merkel, no longer deemed invincible after delivering a historically poor election result, “now faces the most difficult task of her leadership so far,” judged the Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily.

Political scientist Albrecht von Lucke told news channel NTV that already “the loser is Angela Merkel” because, rather than be seen to battle for ideas, she had “fought strategically to maintain power”.

– ‘Hanging by a thread’ –

Hours after a 15-hour red-eye meeting ended around 4:00 am Friday, November 17, Merkel, the veteran of countless all-night EU summits, stressed that “the task of forming a government for Germany is so important that the effort is worthwhile”.

Horst Seehofer, the embattled leader of her Bavarian sister party the CSU, said that “we have the goal of finishing by Sunday” because the German people had the right to know whether a new government would emerge or not.

His party colleague Alexander Dobrindt, known for his acerbic snipes at the Greens, declared darkly that the talks “are hanging by a thread”.

Looming over the political drama is the prickly issue of immigration, a hot-button topic since Merkel in 2015 threw open German borders to a mass influx of over one million asylum seekers.

While the CSU has been sharply critical and wants to cap future arrivals at 200,000 a year, the Greens argue that more refugees should be allowed to bring their families.

Deep differences also remain on climate policy, where the Greens want to phase out dirty coal and combustion-engine cars, while the conservatives and FDP stress the need to protect industry and jobs.

The Greens face a party congress in a week’s time, where their rank-and-file members will give the thumbs up or down on the concessions their leaders may have wrested from the other parties.

‘Merkel’s fading star’

Martin Schulz of the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) – Merkel’s former junior coalition partner that went into opposition after a stinging election loss – reemerged to criticize the painful process.

He charged that the 4 parties were searching for the “lowest common denominator” in an atmosphere of “maximum mutual distrust”, led by Merkel, whom he labelled the “world champion in vagueness”.

Schulz also charged that the odd alliance would diminish Germany’s role in the EU and contribute to the “paralysis of Europe”.

The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily commented that, despite the hurdles, “Merkel can’t afford to fail, because the SPD… won’t come to her rescue again”.

The smaller parties, it said, “are already fighting at the expense of the chancellor, who won’t necessarily get the credit if the talks succeed, but who will certainly be blamed if this experiment fails”.

Fresh elections would heap pressure on all parties, the broadsheet added, but especially on the chancellor “because then Merkel’s star will fade even more quickly, maybe even for good.” – Rappler.com