House to formalize Trump impeachment investigation

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

House to formalize Trump impeachment investigation

AFP

Democrats lay out a formal roadmap for President Donald Trump's impeachment while accumulating more evidence to support charges he improperly pushed Ukraine to boost his own 2020 electoral prospects

WASHINGTON, DC, USA – Democrats laid out a formal roadmap for President Donald Trump’s impeachment on Thursday, October 31, as they accumulated more evidence to support charges that he improperly pushed Ukraine to boost his own 2020 electoral prospects.

One day after a decorated army officer told Congressional investigators he witnessed Trump and a senior diplomat pressure Ukraine, 3 other State Department officials on Wednesday offered more evidence in testimony that supported the allegations against the US leader. (READ: New impeachment witness shakes White House)

And the inquiry testimony set dates for three more witnesses, including Trump’s estranged former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who would have had first-hand knowledge of the president’s alleged effort to leverage military aid to Ukraine in exchange for President Volodymyr Zelensky investigating his Democratic rival Joe Biden.

Even before those interviews take place, Democrats proposed rules to formalize the investigation and set its next phase – which would have open evidentiary hearings that Trump or his lawyers could take part in – ahead of drawing up articles of impeachment.

On Wednesday, the House Rules Committee agreed by a party line vote to put the resolution up for approval before the full House of Representatives on Thursday.

“I didn’t run (for office) to impeach the president,” House Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern said after the vote.

“These are very, very serious matters, and we need a process in place so people know how we’re going to proceed. I think this is a good transparent process.”

Earlier in the day, McGovern said, “There is serious evidence that the president may have violated the constitution.”

Trump: probe is a ‘witch hunt’

Trump blasted the investigation as a “witch hunt” and again claimed there was no “quid pro quo” in his dealings with Zelensky.

But Democrats said the evidence was only getting stronger that he did push Ukraine to open investigations into Biden, whose son had ties to a powerful Ukraine energy company.

The impeachment rules will formalize a process Republicans have alleged has no official grounds, but the Democrats comfortable majority in the House is likely to ensure its passage.

“The evidence we have already collected paints the picture of a President who abused his power by using multiple levers of government to press a foreign country to interfere in the 2020 election,” the leaders of the impeachment inquiry said late Tuesday.

“Following in the footsteps of previous impeachment inquiries, the next phase will move from closed depositions to open hearings where the American people will learn firsthand about the President’s misconduct.”

Aid hold ‘directed by Trump’

On Wednesday, State Department diplomat Christopher Anderson, a former aide to the US special representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker, told the inquiry Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani injected himself into Ukrainian policy discussions to demand Kiev open investigations that could aid Trump.

Another former Volker aide, Catherine Croft, said in prepared testimony that Trump’s chief of staff Mick Mulvaney ordered military aid to Ukraine frozen days before a July 25 phone call in which Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate Biden.

“The only reason given was that the order came at the direction of the president,” Croft said.

And in separate testimony, John Sullivan, nominated to be US ambassador to Russia, told a Congressional hearing that Giuliani was part of an effort designed to smear then-ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who had reportedly resisted White House efforts to pressure Kiev to investigate Biden.

“Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent, I don’t think that would be in accord with our values,” Sullivan told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Bolton testimony planned

The inquiry was to hear Thursday from Tim Morrison, the White House National Security Council’s top Russia expert. Other witnesses have said Morrison had personal knowledge of the efforts to use military aid to pressure Ukraine — the quid pro quo that Trump denies.

Morrison unexpectedly stepped down late Wednesday, with no indications how that might impact his testimony.

“Mr. Morrison has decided to pursue other opportunities — and has been considering doing so for some time,” a senior administration official said.

Two other White House officials, National Security Council lead attorney John Eisenberg and one of his deputies, Michael Ellis, are to testify on November 4.

They would be followed by Bolton on November 7, if he agrees to testify. His testimony could be explosive, given his strained relationship with Trump in September when he left the White House, as the Ukraine allegations first surfaced.

Bolton, other witnesses have said, disagreed strongly with Trump’s tactics and the involvement of Giuliani in Ukraine policy. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!