United States

Judge blocks Arizona law recognizing ‘personhood’ at fertilization

Reuters

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Judge blocks Arizona law recognizing ‘personhood’ at fertilization

WOMEN'S MARCH. A Women's March activist attends a protest in the wake of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion decision, in Washington, DC, USA on July 9, 2022.

Michael A. McCoy/Reuters

US District Judge Douglas Rayes writes that his motion blocking the law was not just about abortion. 'It is about giving people fair notice of what the law means so that they know in advance how to comply.'

 A federal judge on Monday, July 11, blocked a 2021 Arizona law recognizing the personhood of a fetus from the moment of fertilization, siding with abortion providers who said the measure was too vague and exposed them to prosecution.

The Center for Reproductive Rights, which argued on behalf of providers before US District Judge Douglas Rayes last week, also said the provision could conflict with a state law set to take effect this year allowing abortion up to the 15th week of pregnancy.

A lawyer for the Arizona attorney general’s office countered that the provision, which says state law must be interpreted to grant fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses the same “rights, privileges and immunities available to other persons,” was not intended to create any new abortion-related crime.

During the hearing, Rayes expressed concern about a state policy that the provision’s effects be interpreted case by case in court, after providers voiced fears they could be prosecuted for child endangerment or other crimes.

Issuing a ruling on Monday, Rayes wrote that his motion blocking the law was not just about abortion. “It is about giving people fair notice of what the law means so that they know in advance how to comply.”

He said the interpretation policy was “so vague that it (makes) it impossible for plaintiffs to do their work with fair notice of conduct that is forbidden or required, in violation of their procedural due process rights.”

The case is one of many disputes over state abortion laws after the US Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide.

Arizona passed the personhood law in April 2021. Abortion providers sued to block it last August, arguing that it was unconstitutionally vague because it did not make clear what conduct, if any, it would prohibit.

In March, Arizona passed a law banning most abortions after 15 weeks. That measure is set to take effect in September. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!