WTO at a crossroads amid blocked trade deal

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

The World Trade Organization's continued sparring between members puts the long-sought Trade Facilitation Agreement on ice

WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo of Brazil (L) looks on next to the chairperson of the general meeting, Ambassador Shahid Bashir (R), on November 26, 2013 in Geneva, after a crunch general council meeting to decide whether they could put a deal on the table at a make or break summit next month. AFP PHOTO / FABRICE COFFRINI

GENEVA, Switzerland – Weakened by its failure in July to seal a key deal on a global customs pact amid continued wrangling with India, the World Trade Organization is at a crossroads, observers say.

“We are in a unique situation in the history of the organization,” a European diplomat said on condition of anonymity ahead of a meeting later this month that others warn could fatally undermine the global trade body if the deal is not rescued.

A draft of the so-called Trade Facilitation Agreement emerged at the WTO’s Bali conference in December last year and was meant to be finalized at the end of July.

But sparring between members, notably over demands from India that the world body gives the green light to the developing power’s stockpiling of food, have put the long-sought deal on ice.

India and its supporters say such stockpiling is essential to ensure poor farmers and consumers survive in the cut-throat world of business, while Western countries meanwhile have raised concerns that this food could be syphoned onto global markets, skewing trade.

Opening Pandora’s box

If WTO gives in to India’s demands, this would “create a very bad precedent,” the European diplomat said, warning this would open a Pandora’s box as other member states would certainly take the move as a license to change positions and block texts they had helped pass by consensus.

“How could we know if another member state won’t say: we don’t accept anymore what we have agreed?” the diplomat said.

The Europeans staunchly insist that Bali cannot be renegotiated, the diplomat said, warning that WTO’s credibility was at stake.

Instead, “we need to find a solution based on Bali,” the diplomat said.

The 160 countries which make up the WTO set trade rules among themselves in an attempt to ensure a level playing field and spur growth by opening markets and removing trade barriers, including subsidies, excessive taxes and regulations.

Bali was the first multilateral agreement concluded by the WTO since its inception in 1995.

It also signaled the first concrete progress on the Doha Round of trade liberalization talks, launched in 2001 and aimed at underpinning development in poorer nations.

It took nearly a decade to conclude the trade facilitation part of the talks, which began in 2004, and the organization is loath to return to the drawing board.

At Bali, India was granted the right to continue its food stockpiling subsidies until a final solution is found by the end of 2017. 

But last July the country insisted it wanted the issue conclusively settled by the end of this year.

Western countries however insist the trade facilitation deal must move in lockstep with other parts of the Doha deal on agricultural and industrial goods.

Late last month, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told US President Barack Obama he hoped for a deal “soon” to allow the blocked trade facilitation deal to go forward.

“India supports trade facilitation. However, I also expect that we are able to find a solution that takes care of our concern on food security.

“I believe that it should be possible to do that soon,” Modi said.

WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo has been tirelessly campaigning to save the deal, which would streamline global customs procedures, and, he claims, create billions of dollars in benefits each year.

“We must resolve the current impasse and begin to define the path forward for the WTO,” he told business leaders in Toronto this week.

WTO’s General Council, its executive branch, will seek to resolve the issue when it meets on October 21.

“If on October 21, there is no solution, the organization will enter into an existential (crisis),” warned a diplomat based in Geneva, where WTO has its headquarters.

If there is no resolution, the consequences will be “too heavy,” the diplomat warned. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!