Carpio, Del Rosario say PH ‘safe’ with China oil deal

Paterno R. Esmaquel II

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Carpio, Del Rosario say PH ‘safe’ with China oil deal
Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio and Ambassador Albert del Rosario agree that 'nothing is being given away' in the oil deal between the Philippines and China

MANILA, Philippines – The two biggest stalwarts of the Philippines’ case against China, Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio and Ambassador Albert del Rosario, both said the Philippines is “safe” with the recent oil deal between Manila and Beijing.

“From my point of view, I think we’re pretty safe. The government has included service contractors, so if we cooperate, if the cooperation with China on oil and gas activities will be through service contractors, we’re very safe,” Carpio told reporters on the sidelines of a South China Sea forum on Friday, November 23.

During the forum organized by Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Carpio explained why the provision on service contractors makes the MOU safe.

“I don’t have any objection with that kind of arrangement because if China comes in through our service contractors, those service contracts expressly recognize that the area falls within Philippine sovereignty or sovereign rights,” Carpio said.

The justice said, for example, that the service contractor in the Philippines’ Recto Bank (Reed Bank) is Forum Energy. Businessman Manuel V Pangilinan’s PXP Energy Corporation, through its London-listed unit Forum Energy Plc, holds an exploration permit covering Recto Bank.

Carpio explained that China “can come in as a subcontractor of Forum Energy or it can buy into equity of Forum Energy, or it could do both.” He said, “That’s okay because they are coming in to our service contractors.”

‘We are safe with it’

Del Rosario, the Philippines’ foreign secretary during the Aquino administration, agreed with Carpio.

“Acting Chief Justice  Antonio Carpio and I were able to see earlier the signed document which is being referred to at this time. It is the view of the Acting Chief Justice that what was signed is an agreement to negotiate an oil and gas cooperation, and we are safe with it. Nothing is being given away,” Del Rosario said.

“Moving forward, it behooves our negotiators to assure that our Constitution is not violated and the arbitral tribunal outcomes are not undermined,” he continued.

“As well, if we proceed with negotiations, there must be full transparency throughout the whole process,” said the Philippines’ former top diplomat. 

The MOU states that China “authorizes China National Offshore Oil Corporation as the Chinese enterprise for each Working Group,” while the Philippines “will authorize the enterprise(s) that has/have entered into a service contract with the Philippines,” or the Philippine National Oil Company-Exploration Corporation (PNOC-EC) “as the Philippine enterprise(s) for the relevant Working Group.”

The MOU on oil and gas development was among 29 agreements signed during the historic state visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to the Philippines. 

The Philippines and China began to aggressively pursue joint exploration in the West Philippine Sea after Beijing lost a case filed by Manila before a Hague tribunal. Experts have warned that joint development of the West Philippine Sea is unconstitutional if done on China’s terms. –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!
Avatar photo


Paterno R. Esmaquel II

Paterno R. Esmaquel II, news editor of Rappler, specializes in covering religion and foreign affairs. He finished MA Journalism in Ateneo and MSc Asian Studies (Religions in Plural Societies) at RSIS, Singapore. For story ideas or feedback, email