CHR brands anti-terror bill ‘highly intrusive,’ open to abuse

Jodesz Gavilan

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

CHR brands anti-terror bill ‘highly intrusive,’ open to abuse
The Commission on Human Rights says the bill's broad definition of terrorism is an 'overreach' that could harm Filipinos in the long run

MANILA, Philippines – The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) on Tuesday, June 2, raised several concerns over the proposed anti-terror bill that critics fear is being railroaded into law. 

CHR spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia warned against the “broad definition” of what constitutes as terrorism, fearing this could lead to state abuse. 

“Such overreach may be seen as disproportionate and highly intrusive as it allows for room for discretion which could be possibly used to limit substantial freedoms, including expression of dissent and critical perspectives most especially by civil society and human rights groups, under a democracy,” she said in a statement. 

De Guia said that “authorities could wantonly tag exercise of rights as terrorist expressions under this Act.” 

The proposed bill is expected to come into fruition soon after President Rodrigo Duterte certified it urgent on Monday, June 1.

The Senate passed its version last February 26 while the House of Representatives is expected finish its deliberations soon.

CHR also raised concern over provisions of the bill, including the prolonged detention without judicial warrant and the lack of accountability for authorities in the event of “delay in the delivery of detained persons to the proper judicial authorities.”

While ending terrorism is an important, CHR reminds the government that laws and policies should not lead to the stiffling of rights and freedoms of citizens. 

“We must then continue to be vigilant that it is terroristic acts that this bill is seeking to curb, not the legitimate exercise of rights and freedoms,” De Guia said. “And for instances of abuse, those who have used their position and power in excess must also be held to account.”

Human rights and law groups earlier asked Congress to reject the proposed bill, saying that it will be used to weaponize the law against critics of the government.

The Duterte government has been slammed for its handling of critics and independent voices such as journalists and activists. (READ: Duterte’s war on dissent–

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI
Download the Rappler App!
Natsu Ando


Jodesz Gavilan

Jodesz Gavilan is a writer and researcher for Rappler and its investigative arm, Newsbreak. She covers human rights and impunity beats, producing in-depth and investigative reports particularly on the quest for justice of victims of former president Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs and war on dissent.