Wikipedia blocks 381 editor accounts for ‘black hat’ edits

Victor Barreiro Jr.

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Wikipedia blocks 381 editor accounts for ‘black hat’ edits

BORIS ROESSLER

Wikimedia Foundation says most of the articles 'were generally promotional in nature, and often included biased or skewed information, unattributed material, and potential copyright violations'

MANILA, Philippines – Wikipedia blocked 381 user accounts on Monday, August 31, in its drive to stamp out what they call “black hat editing” practices affecting the neutrality of information posted on Wikipedia.

Black hat editing refers to “the practice of accepting or charging money to promote external interests on Wikipedia without revealing their affiliation, in violation of Wikimedia’s Terms of Use.”

The company not only blocked the 381 accounts, but also deleted 210 articles made by these accounts.

A Wikimedia Foundation blogpost explained that most of the articles were related to businesses, business people, or artists, were generally promotional in nature, and often included biased or skewed information, unattributed material, and potential copyright violations.”

The edits appear similar, such that that the Wikipedia community believes they were perpetrated by a coordinated group.

BLACK HAT EDITORS. Hundreds of ‘black hat’ accounts on English Wikipedia were found to be connected during the investigation. The usernames (green) and IP addresses (yellow) have been removed from the image. Graph by James Alexander, freely licensed under CC-by-SA 3.0.

The Wikipedia editing scam

The Guardian added that a scam also appeared to have been occurring.

“Under the scam,” Guardian’s report explained, “draft entries were initially declined publication because they contained too much promotional content. Those operating the sockpuppet account would then make changes to allow the article acceptable for publication.”

Posing as Wikipedia administrators, they would then charge businesses a fee for publication of the article, while in some situations, a monthly fee was asked to protect entries from changes or deletion.

Additional information regarding the investigation, called Orangemoody after the first identified sockpuppet account, is available on this community page. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!
Person, Human, Sleeve

author

Victor Barreiro Jr.

Victor Barreiro Jr is part of Rappler's Central Desk. An avid patron of role-playing games and science fiction and fantasy shows, he also yearns to do good in the world, and hopes his work with Rappler helps to increase the good that's out there.