US-China trade war

US appeals WTO ruling faulting Trump’s China tariffs

Agence France-Presse
US appeals WTO ruling faulting Trump’s China tariffs

In this file photo taken on September 14, 2019, shipping containers from China and other Asian countries are unloaded at the Port of Los Angeles in Long Beach, California. - When President Donald Trump visited a Whirlpool factory in Ohio in August, he boasted that his trade policy had led to the creation of about 200 jobs for the appliance manufacturer. But in slapping tariffs on appliances and components imported from China in response to Whirlpool's pleas, the Republican incumbent ultimately hurt American consumers, as prices for washing machines and dryers soared. The example underscores the double-edged impact of the US leader's aggressive trade tactics, which have produced landmark deals like the USMCA pact with Canada and Mexico and a partial truce with China, but have had adverse effects on everyday Americans and the economy overall. (Photo by Mark RALSTON / AFP)


But the United States also blocks efforts to appoint new judges to the WTO Appellate Body, in effect blocking China's ability to move forward and request financial compensation

Washington has appealed against a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling that faulted United States duties imposed on hundreds of billions of dollars in Chinese goods during the trade wars between the two giants.

The United States announced its decision to appeal during a meeting of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) on Monday, October 26, a WTO official said.

The DSB had ruled on September 15 that the US tariffs imposed in 2018 on some $250 billion of Chinese goods were “inconsistent” with global trade rules, and recommended that Washington “bring its measures into conformity with its obligations.”

The tariffs marked the beginning of the trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer had in September slammed the WTO ruling, saying it proved the WTO “is completely inadequate to stop China’s harmful technology practices.”

On Monday, a US representative asserted that the panel ruling was based on legal errors, insisting that China’s unfair trade practices had cost US innovators, workers, and businesses billions of dollars every year.

The DSB verdict marked one of the first in a series of anticipated panel rulings over complaints filed by a long line of countries over US President Donald Trump’s decision to hit them with steep tariffs on steel and aluminium imports.

Usually, the WTO Appellate Body would have 3 months to rule on any appeals filed. 

But that process has been complicated since the WTO Appellate Body – also known as the supreme court of world trade – stopped functioning last December after years of relentless US opposition.

Washington accuses the court of major overreach and has blocked the appointment of new judges, leaving it without the required quorum.

The US once again on Monday blocked efforts to appoint new Appellate Body judges.

By filing an appeal with nowhere for the appeal to be heard, Washington has in effect blocked China’s ability to move forward and request financial compensation for the US activities deemed illegal by the DSB.

China’s representative told Monday’s DSB meeting it was disappointed with the US decision to appeal, and accused Washington of taking advantage of the current paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body.

There are currently 16 appeals pending in the WTO system with nowhere to go. –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.