‘No contradiction’ in Cornejo’s new rape allegation, says lawyer

According to Cornejo's Legal counsel Howard Calleja, the revelation does not contradict their previous statements

DENIECE CORNEJO. Cornejo at the preliminary at the Department of Justice on February 21. Photo by Jose Del / Rappler

MANILA, Philippines  The revelation that Deniece Cornejo was allegedly raped twice by actor Vhong Navarro does not contradict previous statements by Cornejo, her legal counsel Howard Calleja said on Tuesday, February 25.

A counter-affidavit by Cornejo’s camp, submitted to the Department of Justice on Friday, February 21, during the second preliminary investigation, revealed that actor Vhong Navarro allegedly raped the 22-year-old twice.

Calleja also confirmed to Rappler that Navarro allegedly raped Cornejo on dates January 17 and January 22 in her condominium.

The new information came a month after the controversial incident on January 22, which left Navarro with severe injuries. Since news headlined, conflicting sides have emerged. According to Navarro, he was mauled, threatened and was a victim of extortion.

Cornejo and company are saying they beat up the actor after they caught him attempting to rape Cornejo. On January 29, Cornejo filed a rape case with the Department of Justice (DOJ) against the actor. 

‘Nothing contradictory’

According to ABS-CBN, Navarro’s camp questions why the revelation came only now. According to Navarro’s legal counsel Alma Mallonga, the counter-affidavit shows inconsistencies in Cornejo’s statement, and may be in favor of her client’s defense.

Speaking to Rappler, Calleja claimed the new information on their counter-affidavit does not contradict the account on their first affidavit regarding the case. According to Calleja, information regarding the alleged rape on January 17 was not included in their first affidavit, but the said statement “[did] not say that nothing happened.”

Calleja noted that it cannot be denied that a sexual incident did happen, given that Navarro’s affidavit also states “an allegation of a sexual act on the 17th.” Calleja said, however, that Navarro’s affidavit claimed the act was consensual.

“What cannot be taken out anymore was there was a sexual incident. Even Vhong said that, however, contrary to his allegation, it is not consensual, it is rape, it was a forced sexual incident,” said Calleja.

In an interview days after the January 22 incident, Navarro also admitted that “something happened” between them on January 17, but he said they did not engage in sexual intercourse. In the interview in Buzz ng Bayan, Navarro said Cornejo had no adverse reaction during the events of their first get together.

ONGOING CASE. Vhong Navarro at the Department of Justice after being discharged from the hospital on February 6. Photo by Jose Del/Rappler

‘Respect, leeway, understanding’

Calleja told Rappler that Navarro’s affidavit mentioning the events of January 17, was what prompted his client to recount what happened on the said night. The revelation, he said, “came after reviewing his affidavit,” said Calleja.

Calleja reiterated that understanding must be granted to Cornejo and alleged rape victims, because of the difficulty of reliving the experience.

“It is hard for a victim to relive one incident of rape, it is difficult or harder for them to relive more than once or twice or thrice, to relive it again and again.”

He added, “Deniece is the victim of rape and even in our jurisprudence, even if you talk to any doctor, being a victim of rape is not easy. That is why you have to give her some respect, give her some leeway or understanding in order for her to cope.”

Calleja claimed another difficulty encountered by his client is judgment and stereotyping by the public.

“They’re being stereotyped. If you’re a rape victim, you should be crying always. hindi naman ganoon…I have handled a lot of rape victims, some are crying, some are strong… people cope differently, that’s why we should give her respect and not judge.”

Gaps in the NBI investigation?

CCTV EVIDENCE. According to Calleja, the NBI admits the CCTV footages are spliced. Photo by Jose Del/Rappler

The case is now in the hands of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), which earlier filed complaints against Cornejo, Lee, and company. They were charged with illegal detention, serious physical injuries, grave threats, grave coercion, unlawful arrest, and ‘threatening to publish and offer to prevent such publication for a compensation.”

CCTV footage obtained by the NBI also appeared to support Navarro’s story.

Calleja, however, said the NBI admitted that the CCTV footage obtained from Forbeswood condominium are “unauthenticated and spliced.” Calleja also claimed they do not have a copy of the complete footage.

“It was not my statement but the statement of the NBI agent who was called by the fiscal, by the state prosecutor and they said are what they have are only copies provided to them by Forbeswood, which is incomplete…What thay have is only edited, unathaunticated, incomplete, not raw version, that is what they (NBI) said.”

In the same ABS-CBN report, Mallonga said they see no problem with the CCTV footage released by the NBI. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.