SUMMARY
This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.
Not all filmmakers aim for high art. In the case of director Brett Ratner, his ambitions have always been fairly transparent – make the movie that makes the money. But with his last film failing in both ticket sales and quality, Ratner has got a lot to prove now that he’s back in the director’s chair.
With Hercules, Ratner aims right for the heart of the Hollywood summer, armed with literally the biggest star in Hollywood and a Greek legend to eclipse even him. Unfortunately, even with all the right pieces, Hercules still fails to be a satisfying summer blockbuster.
Based on the graphic novel by the late Steve Moore, Hercules is neither reboot nor remake. It is, instead, a full reimagining of the iconic Greek demigod. This new take on the son of Zeus is novel enough, fashioning Hercules (Dwayne Johnson) as more man than myth. He is no glorious warrior with milk white skin. He is a mercenary, travelling the far corners of Greece on the promise of coin and copper.
But Hercules uses his legend to his advantage, relying on his storyteller of a nephew Iolaus (Reece Ritchie) to spread word of his feats to strike fear into his would-be enemies. From there, Hercules alongside his loyal companions Autolycus (Rufus Sewell), Amphiaraus (Ian McShane), Atalanta (Ingrid Bolsø Berdal) and Tydeus (Aksel Hennie), make short work of anyone with a price on their head.
In Hercules, Greek mythology is demystified, broken down by reason and empirical evidence. Centaurs are merely men on horseback and the great Hydra is simply a band of warriors with headdresses made of reptilian hide.
Hercules presents us with a Greece devoid of gods and myth. But it is also a Greece bereft of logic, lacking in scale, gratuitous in exposition and utterly wanting in spirit. Despite its best intentions, Hercules wastes the potential of its original material by being far too dull to be entertaining and far too daft to be insightful.
Even as a film that aims to entertain, Hercules fails to do just that.
The man and the myth
Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson is the film’s most obvious selling point. But outside of his physique, there’s nothing particularly convincing about the ex-wrestler’s performance.
It’s especially distracting when the rest of the cast sports a clearly European accent while Johnson brandishes the only American accent in the film. For a film that’s supposed to immerse you in ancient Greece, Johnson’s performance throws right back into 21st century California.
Truth be told, Johnson is not as terrible an actor as most pundits have made him out to be. But his strength has always his ability to be both comic and family-friendly despite his imposing physique. In Hercules, however, Johnson is none of those things.
In Hercules, the supposed son of Zeus is tormented and lost. (Mild spoiler alert) Hercules is plagued by visions of his murdered children and his slain wife. While the truth behind his family’s death isn’t revealed until much later in the film, Johnson fails miserably at conveying any emotion outside of an unbridled need to bash everything with a club.
Hercules may be the strongest man on earth, but unfortunately, he isn’t a very convincing one.
No heart, no spirit
But while it’s easy to make Johnson the heart of the film’s flaws, it’d be unfair to lay the blame solely on his shoulders. As a whole, Hercules takes itself far too seriously, taking its sweet time before getting to any of the action. The first real battle comes a full 30 minutes into the film, and outside the odd man-handling, there’s a total of only three action sequences, none of which are especially satisfying.
Despite its larger-than-life subject, Hercules feels suffocatingly small. Greece is presented as nothing more than a patch of cordoned off hill sides and some makeshift cities. And though the action sequences do present some modicum of entertainment, it’s nothing we’ve seen before, if not, better.
Plot holes the size of Johnson’s biceps plague the screenplay and scenes move with the urgency of a bored snail. Without any heart or spirit to pump life into the film’s muscles, Hercules ironically becomes one of the weakest entrants among the year’s summer blockbusters.
All things considering, Hercules is admittedly Ratner’s most watchable film since the Rush Hour series. But with the Jackie Chan-headlined franchise more than 15 years old, Ratner may no longer be the hit-maker he once was.
Given Hollywood’s track record, this is definitely not the last we’ll see of Hercules on the big screen. But if there’s any justice in the world, his next iteration won’t be directed by Brett Ratner. – Rappler.com
Zig Marasigan is a freelance screenwriter and director who believes that cinema is the cure for cancer. Follow him on Twitter at @zigmarasigan.
More from Zig Marasigan
- ‘Kimmy Dora (Ang Kiyemeng Prequel)’: A fallen franchise
- ‘My Little Bossings’: The horrible business of show business
- ‘Boy Golden’: Violent, colorful, and masterful fun
- ‘10,000 Hours:’ A higher standard of politics
- ‘Pagpag:’ Stylish superstition
- ‘Kaleidoscope World:’ A Magalona melodrama
- ‘Pedro Calungsod: Ang Batang Martir:’ A sermon best saved for church
- MMFF Cinephone: From film to phone
- ‘Islands:’ In the ocean of isolation
- ‘Shift’ is not a love story
- ‘Bukas Na Lang Sapagka’t Gabi Na:’ The art of rebellion
- ‘Blue Bustamante:’ A hero with a heart
- ‘Girl, Boy, Bakla, Tomboy’: A hilariously absurd party of four
- ‘Lone Survivor’: War through Western eyes
- ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’: the brilliant crime of capitalism
- ‘Bride for Rent’: Falling back on formula
- ‘Mumbai Love’: Lost in Bollywood
- ‘Snowpiercer’: Beautiful, brutal science fiction
- ‘The LEGO Movie’ Review: A genuine block-buster
- ‘RoboCop’ Review: More metal than man
- ‘American Hustle’ Review: Style, subtlety, raw energy
- ‘Starting Over Again’: A different kind of Valentine’s
- ‘Basement’ Review: Better left dead
- ‘Nebraska’ Review: An elegant ode to the country
- ‘Third Eye’ Review: A vision of inconsistency
- ‘Her’ Review: Growth, change, and love
- ’12 Years a Slave’: Why it deserved the Best Picture Win
- ‘Kamandag ni Venus’: An achievement in awfulness
- ‘Divergent’ Review: Troubled teenagers
- ‘Captain America: The Winter Soldier’ Review: Behind the shield
- ‘Diary ng Panget’ Review: Where youth is only skin deep
- Summer 2014: 20 Hollywood movies we can’t wait to see
- ‘Da Possessed’ Review: A rushed return
- ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ Review: The enemy within
- ‘Godzilla’ Review: Size doesn’t matter
- ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ Review: Rewriting history
- ‘The Fault In Our Stars’ Review: Shines bright despite the faults
- ‘Noah’ review: Not the Bible story you know
- ‘My Illegal Wife’ Review: A film worth forgetting
- ‘How to Train Your Dragon 2’ Review: A soaring sequel
- ’22 Jump Street’ Review: Solid and self-aware
- ‘Third Person’ Review: A writer’s dilemma
- ‘Transformers: Age of Extinction’ Review: Mind-numbing deja vu
- ‘Overtime’ Review: ’90s thriller meets camp comedy
- ‘Dawn of the Planet of the Apes’ Review: More man than ape
- ‘She’s Dating the Gangster’: Asking for a greater love story
Add a comment
How does this make you feel?
There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.