Hollywood movies

‘Top Gun: Maverick’ lawsuit against Paramount rejected by US judge


This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

‘Top Gun: Maverick’ lawsuit against Paramount rejected by US judge

FILE PHOTO: Cast member Tom Cruise arrives at the global premiere for the film Top Gun: Maverick on the USS Midway Museum in San Diego, California, U.S., May 4, 2022.

Mario Anzuoni/REUTERS

A US District Judge said that the sequel was not 'substantially similar' to Ehud Yonay’s 1983 magazine article titled 'Top Guns'

Paramount Pictures won the dismissal of a lawsuit claiming its 2022 Tom Cruise blockbuster Top Gun: Maverick borrowed too much from a 1983 magazine article that inspired the original Top Gun film.

In a decision on Friday, April 5, US District Judge Percy Anderson in Los Angeles said the sequel was not “substantially similar” to Ehud Yonay’s “Top Guns,” about the US Navy’s Top Gun fighter pilot training school in San Diego.

Yonay’s widow Shosh Yonay and son Yuval Yonay, heirs to his copyright, said they deserved some of the sequel’s profits, after Paramount built a billion-dollar franchise off an article that “breathed life into the technical humdrum of a navy base.”

The plaintiffs will appeal, their lawyer Marc Toberoff said.

“Once Yonay’s widow and son exercised their rights [to] reclaim his exhilarating story, Paramount hand-waved them away exclaiming ‘What copyright?'” Toberoff said in a statement. “It’s not a good look.”

Paramount said in a statement, “We are pleased that the court recognized that plaintiffs’ claims were completely without merit.”

Top Gun: Maverick featured Cruise reprising his role as US Navy test pilot Pete “Maverick” Mitchell.

It grossed $1.5 billion worldwide, becoming Cruise’s biggest film, and is the 12th highest-grossing film according to Box Office Mojo.

The plaintiffs, both from Israel, claimed that the fictional “Maverick” was “derivative” of nonfictional “Top Guns” because of similar plots, characters, dialogue, settings and themes.

But the judge said copyright law does not protect factual elements such as the identities of real people in “Top Guns,” or familiar plot elements such as pilots embarking on missions, being shot down or carousing at a bar.

He also said copyright law does not protect themes such as “the sheer love of flying,” or the only specific dialogue – “Fight’s on” – identified in both works.

“No reasonable juror could find substantial similarity of ideas and expression,” Anderson wrote.

Anderson also said Paramount was not required to credit Ehud Yonay in the sequel, as it had in the original “Top Gun” with a “suggested by” credit, after the Yonays in 2020 terminated Paramount’s exclusive movie rights to his article.

The article was published in the May 1983 issue of California magazine.

The case is Yonay et al v. Paramount Pictures Corp, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 22-03846. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!