musicians

Court revives Nirvana child pornography lawsuit over ‘Nevermind’ cover

Reuters

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Court revives Nirvana child pornography lawsuit over ‘Nevermind’ cover

FILE PHOTO: Rarely displayed memorabilia including iconic clothing and musical instruments of the late Kurt Cobain of the legendary grunge band Nirvana, are on display at the "Nirvana: Taking Punk to the Masses" exhibition of the Experience Music Project (EMP) in Seattle on April 15, 2011.

REUTERS/Anthony Bolante/File Photo

A US appeals court revives the lawsuit accusing the rock band of publishing child pornography by using a photo of a naked 4-month-old baby

A US appeals court on Thursday, December 21 revived a lawsuit accusing the rock band Nirvana of publishing child pornography by using a photograph of a naked four-month-old baby on the cover of its hit 1991 album Nevermind.

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s decision that Spencer Elden, the baby depicted on the cover, had waited too long to bring his lawsuit against the seminal Seattle grunge band.

The court did not address whether the cover of Nevermind constitutes child pornography.

“This procedural setback does not change our view,” Nirvana attorney Bert Deixler said on Thursday. “We will defend this meritless case with vigor and expect to prevail.”

Elden’s attorney Robert Lewis said that Elden is “very pleased with the decision and looks forward to having his day in court.”

Elden, now 32, first sued the band and its label Universal Music Group in 2021, accusing them of sexually exploiting him through his depiction on the Nevermind album cover and causing him continuing personal harm.

Other defendants include surviving Nirvana members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, late lead singer Kurt Cobain’s widow Courtney Love and photographer Kirk Weddle.

The lawsuit stemmed from Nirvana’s use of a photo taken by Weddle at the Pasadena Aquatic Center in California that depicted Elden swimming naked toward a dollar bill pierced on a fish hook.

US District Judge Fernando Olguin in Los Angeles said last year that Elden’s lawsuit must be dismissed because he did not sue within a 10-year limitations period after learning of the cove.

A unanimous 9th Circuit panel reversed the decision on Thursday. The appeals court said that Elden could still sue based on Nirvana’s republication of the cover more recently, including in a re-released version of Nevermind from 2021. – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI
Download the Rappler App!