singers

Taylor Swift, songwriters agree to end ‘Shake It Off’ copyright case

Reuters

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Taylor Swift, songwriters agree to end ‘Shake It Off’ copyright case

FILE PHOTO: Taylor Swift performs during the iHeartRadio Jingle Ball concert at Madison Square Garden in the Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., December 13, 2019. Picture taken December 13, 2019.

REUTERS/Caitlin Ochs/File Photo/File Photo/File Photo

Songwriters Sean Hall and Nathan Butler told a Los Angeles federal judge they will dismiss their 2017 case with prejudice

Two songwriters have dropped their lawsuit claiming Grammy-winning musician Taylor Swift copied their lyrics in her 2014 number-one hit “Shake It Off,” according to court documents filed on Monday, December 12.

Sean Hall and Nathan Butler told a Los Angeles federal judge they will dismiss their 2017 case with prejudice, which means it cannot be refiled.

A trial in the case had been scheduled to begin January 17.

Monday’s court papers, filed jointly by attorneys for both Swift and the songwriters, did not say if there was a settlement. Representatives for the parties did not immediately respond to requests for more information.

In “Shake It Off,” Swift sings: “the players gonna play, play, play, play, play, and the haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate.”

“Playas Gon’ Play,” written by Hall and Butler, included the phrases “playas, they gonna play, and haters, they gonna hate.” The song, performed by R&B group 3LW, was released in 2001 and appeared on the Billboard Hot 100 and MTV’s Total Request Live.

A judge dismissed the case in 2018, but a US appeals court revived it in 2019.

Swift told the court in August that she had never heard 3LW’s song before writing “Shake It Off.” She said she had heard the phrases “players gonna play” and “haters gonna hate” used commonly to “express the idea that one can or should shrug off negativity.”

Hall and Butler said that the lyrics were too close for their similarity to be a coincidence. They had asked for an unspecified amount of money damages. – Rappler.com 

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!