climate change

Oil majors not in sync with global climate goals – report

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Oil majors not in sync with global climate goals – report

NORCO, LA - AUGUST 21: A gas flare from the Shell Chemical LP petroleum refinery illuminates the sky in Norco, Louisiana, on August 21, 2019. Located about 10 miles up the Mississippi River from New Orleans, the plant agreed to install $10 million in pollution monitoring and control equipment in 2018 to settle allegations that flares used to burn off emissions were operating in violation of federal law (the Clean Air Act). Many of the coastal parishes in Louisiana have a long and ongoing history in oil and gas production, which is often at odds with concerns of environmentalists. Drew Angerer/Getty Images/AFP


'We cannot depend on the same companies that got us into this crisis to get us out of it – we see a need for governments to step in,' says Kelly Trout, co-author of the 'Big Oil: Reality Check' report

Oil and gas giants are far from aligning with the global climate change goals they purport to uphold, and only a government-managed decline of the sector can prevent climate catastrophe, according to an analysis released on Wednesday, September 23.

“We have seen a wave of announcements from oil companies over the last 9 months claiming to be part of the solution on climate, but none of their plans measure up to what is needed,” co-author Kelly Trout, a senior research analyst at Oil Change, told Agence France-Presse.

Oil majors have touted measures such as reducing the carbon intensity of their products, transitioning into renewable energy, storing “captured” CO2 underground, and offsetting emissions through reforestation.

The report stacked up the climate commitments of 8 oil and gas companies against the Paris climate goal of curbing global warming at 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

Under the 2015 treaty, nations are enjoined to cap the planet’s average rise in temperature at “well below” 2°C, and 1.5°C if feasible.

A subsequent report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) showed 1.5°C to be the safer limit by far, and laid out scenarios for achieving that goal by slashing or sequestering greenhouse gas emissions.

The IPCC has calculated that the additional release of more than 500 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere would push temperatures above the 1.5°C threshold.

If global CO2 emissions continue at the recent level of about 40 billion tons a year, this “carbon budget” would be used up in less than a decade and a half.

BP, Chevron, Eni, Equinor, ExxonMobil, Repsol, Shell, and Total, all based in Europe or the United States, have to varying degrees laid out strategies they say are compatible with the Paris targets.

Failing grades

Using the 1.5°C threshold as a benchmark, Trout and colleagues graded 10 components of each company’s climate plan along the spectrum of “fully aligned” to “grossly insufficient.”

Pledges to stop approving new extraction projects, for example, were judged “grossly inefficient” in all 8 oil giants.

The same failing mark was given across the board for committing to a date to end oil and gas extraction; being “honest” about the high carbon content of gas; and – with the exception of BP – promising to stop exploration.

Even if global use of coal – which powers 40% of electricity generation worldwide – were phased out overnight, developed gas and oil reserves would still push the world beyond the 1.5°C threshold, earlier research has shown.

“The only reason that big oil companies have started to change their tune on climate is that they saw they were at risk of losing their social license as millions of people join climate strikes around the world,” said Trout.

Investors and public finance institutions have likewise started to pull back from fossil fuels, though coal has by far taken the biggest hit.

The report, entitled “Big Oil: Reality Check,” also slams the publicly traded firms for relying on hard-to-measure reforestation and embryonic CO2 storage schemes to offset emissions from their products.

In the end, only governments can ensure the managed decline of fossil fuel-based energy, the report concluded.

“We cannot depend on the same companies that got us into this crisis to get us out of it – we see a need for governments to step in,” Trout said.   

“An arsonist pledging to light a few less fires is still an arsonist.” –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!