DOCUMENT: SC Justice Leonen’s dissenting opinion on Sereno ouster

Rappler.com

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

DOCUMENT: SC Justice Leonen’s dissenting opinion on Sereno ouster
"Even if the Chief Justice has failed our expectations, quo warranto, as a process to oust an impeachable officer and a sitting member of the Supreme Court, is a legal abomination,” says Associate Justice Marvic Leonen

MANILA, Philippines – On Friday, May 11, the Supreme Court voted to oust  Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno through a quo warranto petition.

Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, one of 6 justices who voted against the petition, said in an impassioned dissenting opinion that the ruling has left the High Court “vulnerable” and that the petition has set “a precedent that gravely diminishes judicial independence.”

Read his full opinion here: 

 

Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!